Zhang Wenhong's paper was reported for suspected plagiarism. Now an investigation has been launched. Will he become the next Zhai Tianlin?

As soon as this incident was reported, it quickly aroused heated discussions on the Internet. Some people said that he would become the next Zhai Tianlin? Because Zhai Tianlin was also known as a doctorate at that time, but he was slapped in the face, his character collapsed, and he became a joke in the entertainment industry. But some people firmly support Dr. Zhang Wenhong, and they believe that there must be a misunderstanding. Furthermore, in 2000, the technology for checking plagiarism was very backward, so it was difficult to be specific! Some people also said: If you plagiarize, you plagiarize, and there are not so many excuses. Just because we are old, we cannot pursue responsibility. Zhang Wenhong is suspected of plagiarism

The suspected plagiarism of Zhang Wenhong's doctoral thesis has caused a lot of controversy. This incident originated from a shocking revelation made by a netizen named "Da Sheng Shuo". The netizen posted an article at noon on August 14 pointing out that Zhang Wenhong's doctoral thesis written in 2000 was suspected of plagiarizing Huang Hainan's "Molecular Biology of KatG Gene and Isoniazid Resistance of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis" and was suspected of "academic fraud."

As soon as the news broke, calls for relevant departments to investigate continued to expand. The Graduate School of Fudan University issued a "Response to the Report on Dr. Zhang Wenhong's Study of BitText at Our School." The response stated that Fudan University has received relevant reports and has also paid attention to the online reflections on some issues in the review of Zhang Wenhong's doctoral thesis. The school has launched an investigation and verification, and the investigation results will be announced in a timely manner. Did Zhang Wenhong really plagiarize?

After the incident came out, many people wondered how a paper with such a high plagiarism check passed the review in the first place. Wasn't there a plagiarism checking system in 2000? In fact, this matter is easy to understand. First of all, Dr. Zhang's article was published in 2000, that is, 21 years ago. The plagiarism check at that time should not be as strict as it is now.

Furthermore, it seems that part of the actual "review" content that Dr. Zhang was accused of plagiarizing was not standardized in 2000, so this situation occurred. Some netizens pointed out that if the part Zhang Wenhong was accused of plagiarizing was the main text, then there would be no problem with such questioning. However, the review part is actually equivalent to summary and citation. The content of this part does not actually involve any "scientific research results." Therefore, in the past, many professors did not pay attention to this part of the audit when reviewing papers.

After the paper review was standardized, everyone paid attention to other parts except the main text. Now, even the review part is not allowed to be plagiarized. But is it too harsh to ask for a paper written 21 years ago based on the current paper requirements? Moreover, Dr. Zhang's entire paper is more than 70,000 words long. Compared with the approximately 3,300 words of the content accused of plagiarism, it actually only accounts for a small proportion, only about 4%.

Furthermore, Professor Huang’s full text is more than 3,700 words, and there are 19 references at the end. To sum up, the author believes that Professor Zhang is not actually plagiarized. Of course, the final judgment has to be left to Fudan Graduate School. Now that Fudan University has responded, we only need to wait for the results of the investigation. As for now, we should not draw any conclusions about Dr. Zhang. No one is perfect in the world

Including Zhang Wenhong is no exception. Because of this, to evaluate a person, we must observe his words and even more, his actions. When many people scolded Zhang Wenhong with vicious words, wanting to make him stink and step on him again, what was Zhang Wenhong doing? It is not difficult to see if we push the time forward 10 days and 240 hours. He is still performing his duties as a doctor, including outpatient clinics, ward rounds, and surgeries as always;

He is still performing his duties as an expert, using the gentlest words to warn Shanghai citizens what they should do; In adhering to the bottom line of a public figure, silence is a channel for him to preserve his dignity. Amidst all the scolding, he was not disturbed and continued to tell the truth and do practical things. Shanghai is lucky to have Zhang Wenhong; Zhang Wenhong is also lucky to be in Shanghai.

Imperfect heroes should also be cherished. What is Zhang Wenhong’s most recognized character among netizens? It is he who always stands out during the epidemic; it is he who has a profound understanding of his professional field and can extremely condense key information to tell the public; it is he who, like every ordinary person, hopes that the world will get better. It was he who always spoke up bravely. If such people are subject to online violence and unprovoked attacks, who would dare to do this from now on?