Now, some married women want to divide the family property. Do you think this is appropriate?

To tell you from my personal experience, I must, my brother and sister, my parents scrimp and save all their lives before buying a suite. When my father died, my brother was unmarried and had no object. Our custom here is that all the property belongs to the son, and the daughter doesn't, but the parents also raise the son. My daughter's conscience is good. Although I didn't ask for a room, I contributed as much as my brother in hospital, and I didn't feel anything wrong. Later, my brother asked me to get a notarization after marriage.

Finally, he didn't want my mother, and said that your daughter is good, you can go to her home. It's been four or five years now, and our brother and sister are enemies who don't bother each other, so you don't have to have anything you want for those who are full of interests and have no good feelings. He doesn't think you should, but you should give it to him, and your relationship will not be good in the future. Everyone will say that. I understand that now in your heart, I also have parents. I think married daughters also have the obligation to take care of their parents and the right to divide property. Let's talk about it together It doesn't matter if the conditions are good, but if you don't have the conscience to take the initiative to fight for it, it is out of the box.

Reasonable people in Dali still have to discuss giving some money, and it is reasonable to want to send their daughter away. In fact, the brothers and sisters all agreed, mainly the sister-in-law and the aunt. They have no feelings for their sister-in-law and don't want to give money. As brothers and younger brothers, wives should listen to what they say, and don't listen to what they shouldn't.

Our basic daughter can't get a house and may give some money, but our daughter-in-law is very powerful and has no money. Some people say it's old people's money. Can the daughter-in-law manage it? You have never lived in the countryside. Daughter-in-law has a great say, and many old people listen to her. If the door collapses, you can't get in. If you live in your daughter's house, you will be laughed to death. Even if I suffer indignities at my son's house, I won't go to my daughter's permanent residence. There are too many such situations in rural areas.

It is reasonable and legal that married women are also heirs. The problem is that a woman and her husband have formed a new family. If the husband's sisters also go back to their parents' home to fight for property at this time, such reincarnation is empathy. Ask the married daughter, of course, she doesn't agree that her husband and sisters will come back to fight for property. Everyone knows the truth.

Daughters have the obligation to support their parents and the right to inherit their property. A son, like a daughter, has no daughter-in-law. Because he has no obligation to support his in-laws, he has no right to own his parents' property. If children are filial to their daughters, whether they want to go or not, the old people think that their sons will inherit their parents' property. Now if you look at the headlines, you will find that many daughters-in-law say that they will not support their parents-in-law, so their parents-in-law are forced to think.

When a daughter gets married, she has her own family. If her parents are ill, she can call them back to serve her. It is essential for a mother-in-law to be kind to her children, or to be a good person herself, treat her daughter-in-law and daughter in general, make the family harmonious, and let her daughter-in-law take care of you willingly.

In fact, in the Central Plains, most families are supported by their sons. When a daughter gets married and has money to give up, no one will accuse her of not supporting the elderly! Sons usually stay with their parents. Most rural parents have no pension, and their sick lives are borne by their sons! Like my grandmother, I built a mud house for my father, and nothing else. Now she still lives with my parents, and my third aunt has time to visit. As the old saying goes, the relationship between the married daughter's children and her family will not exceed two generations. Look at my mother's uncle. When she left, the relationship between my niece and my uncle's menstruating child basically ended.

This is one of the reasons why the older generation must have sons. Regardless of rural cities, the relationship between relatives is even weaker now. How many grandchildren really take care of grandma's family? Some people know, but few people know. But there are still many grandchildren who take care of my milk. Now it is said that whether the married daughter can come back and divide the property depends on the situation. Many social problems are here now. There is no shadow when taking care of the elderly, and favorable times appear. It's all about money

How to divide parents' property and children? Whether it is all given to the son or equally shared by the children, the son should bear the main responsibility for providing for the aged, especially the economic responsibility. Daughters also have to bear responsibilities, more in terms of responsibilities and obligations, which are economically secondary. Sons are the beneficiaries of parents' property, that is, the right to distribution. Sons are the main ones and daughters are the auxiliary ones. The daughter marries her husband's family, the son is the master and the daughter is the assistant. As a daughter, she has nothing to lose. But China's national conditions are like this, and the water spilled by the married daughter. Most daughters really have no home when they grow up. My parents don't prefer boys to girls, but after I get married, I can make it clear that I am an outsider and a person who can be hurt at will. Now my heart is broken. It doesn't matter. Just have a small family.

To be honest, it doesn't matter if you don't give it to your daughter. I really don't want to make money when my parents are sick. My parents usually work as nannies in my son's house, not to mention my parents have been raising them for 18 years. Shouldn't your adoptive parents take care of them? In the countryside, there are several parents who have raised 18 years. Besides, hasn't the inheritor raised 18 years? The adoptive parents who share the property are the most suitable, and the daughter can only assist when she is free.

Actually, it's good not to inherit the family property. The daughter of her husband's family can't inherit the property either. If the daughter doesn't inherit the property, the parents will only take care of it and don't pay. If the daughter inherits the property, the proportion of brothers and sisters will be more. If the daughter does not inherit the property, the brothers will only turn against each other. There are many traditions, but it is good to inherit one's family property. If inheritance is tradition and providing for the aged is legal, daughters will really be in a dilemma and the divorce rate will definitely rise.

It should be divided, because every child has the obligation to support the elderly, so every old man's property has the right to be inherited by his children. Some elderly people who have no support take their children to court. Why can't they just tell their sons not to sue their daughters, but take them to court? Some old people don't support their children. In fact, they are too biased and take their son too seriously, which has already chilled the child's heart. I never sympathize with those old people who have no one to support them. It's their own fault, not their children.

If it were me, I would definitely want it, because I am also a child at home, and I deserve it. Then I can give more subsidies to my family. This is my filial piety, completely different. I think it is very wrong to treat my parents-in-law both internally and externally. Our elder sister said that she would not go to school in the future, because she spent a lot of money and now she has the best conditions, so she takes care of her younger brother, not because she is a girl.