How to treat anonymous counselors of qq group students in Hefei University1Class 2, Grade 8?

I couldn't believe it when I first saw the news. I don't think this looks like what should happen in the atmosphere of a university campus, but more like what happens in a hierarchical workplace or even officialdom. Although the students were wrong, I was dumbfounded by the counselor's response. Does this sound like what a college counselor said? I feel like an ordinary citizen who doesn't know how to communicate with students. To tell the truth, nowadays college counselors are generally students who have just graduated from graduate schools, let alone real university teachers. Most of them are far from their knowledge level. They just graduated, and some of them are as youthful as this counselor, and they speak and do things straight and have certain rights in their hands. Some people will gradually lose themselves in their desire for this right, and over time they will put on airs in front of students.

Let's talk about this student. Although his way of speaking is really inappropriate, the cause of this incident is the mandatory task arranged by the counselor. To tell the truth, is it less for each of us to perform the mandatory tasks arranged by the school or the teacher when we go to school? It's easy to talk about collective honor. Who doesn't know that school leaders or teachers have more achievements in order to complete their tasks and flatter their superiors? Also a sense of collective honor! I find it ridiculous for you to say that!

Will sending screenshots like this invade people's privacy? My first question.

Tell me my opinion.

First, from the perspective of counselors.

This is a common problem. Many college students enter the school, in addition to studying, but also have a variety of university activities to enrich their extracurricular life, activities need students to participate together. With the instructions of the school leaders, a certain number and scale of student activities are held every year. Part of the tuition fee paid by each student at the time of admission is used as the activity fund to prepare for the activity. However, the enthusiasm of students to participate in activities is generally not high-to issue compulsory participation places to each class, each class must hand in the registration list. Everything is a measure taken to organize and prepare activities. As counselors in direct contact with students, parents should take care of everything. The head teacher is a part-time teacher and won't care too much about the things in the class. College students who speak well need freedom, so it is the counselors who suffer more. So the counselor's words are not calm enough, but they are understandable.

Second, from the perspective of students.

University activities should follow the voluntary principle, and the registration list is voluntary. If it is mandatory to take turns, it will make students psychologically unacceptable. In addition, the rehearsal of the team of the school sports meeting is tense and tiring, and it also takes up a lot of personal time. The key is that there are not many benefits-social practice points-because there are too many people, so they give less points, and students are not stupid, so it counts.

In addition, there is no freedom in high school in universities. High schools always expel students from detention for observation, which makes students afraid. But in universities, if you can be lazy, you will be lazy.

Thirdly, let me talk about this common phenomenon in universities.

I have to say, new college students, personally, feel more and more inferior to their predecessors, more expensive, less bitter and more calculating. This is a helpless side effect of the new era, so schools should formulate new measures according to these problems in order to cultivate talents.

Students are young and energetic, and counselors are not worthy to be teachers.

Counselors have great rights. Although they are not big officials, they have real power. As the saying goes, if you are not afraid of officials, you are afraid of management.

I remember when I first went to college, a friend who was far away from home finally met a classmate and friend who hit it off. Because I am tall, I don't coordinate with some actions of my new classmates and friends during military training. I was caught by the instructor and severely criticized, and I was also punished to stand in the sun. Still standing with your feet half suspended. One stop is forty or fifty minutes. At that time, the quality of instructors was really poor. Soldiers of fortune are always ready to hit people.

Closer to home, when the counselor saw that it was a woman, she didn't ask random questions, threatened us with cynicism, and used us as a negative teaching material, saying that if she didn't train well, she wouldn't get credits (military training did have credits), let alone scholarships. The friend muttered a few words, as if threatening not to take anything, and the counselor was furious. Then there was a sermon and threats from above. Later, at noon, my classmates and I stood as punishment. The counselor said to me, you go. I said, I'm not going. If I want to go, we will go together. We will be punished together. The counselor was completely angry and growled at me. Don't bring your old black society temper to college. (My college was also a 2 1 1) I was so sweaty at that time. Can such a person be a psychological counselor? Isn't the counselor the instructor of student life? Up to now, it has been 10 years since graduation, and I haven't contacted that counselor again.

The position of counselor should be abolished, and universities (including undergraduate courses) should combine the senior system with the tutorial system. I remember that in the past, Wuhan University implemented tutorial system (including undergraduate course) and Huazhong Normal University implemented senior system (speaking of which, many people should probably know my alma mater).

I clicked on this title only when I saw it, because the class in our class also encountered such a situation, and it was posted anonymously, because one of our female tutors, Yao Xing (known as the first of the four donkey kong), offended many students when she was doing her graduation project at the university, but she was the director of our major. On the occasion of graduation, it can be said that our graduates are "life is worse than death", so I won't give an example. Tell me why it is similar to the subject. It is because Mr. Yao's request is too abnormal and torturous that a student in our group anonymously scolds our teacher Yao. The specific content is life attack, which is ugly anyway. Our group is the general group of senior graduates, and our professional teachers and students are in this group, and vice versa. This abusive person is anonymous, so it can't be found out. What's even more funny is that someone echoed this anonymous person's words, and everyone said that xxx (the person who spoke to him) must be very panicked now. Because the students at the back agreed to find out who scolded our teacher Yao, and the teacher came out to take advantage of Mr. Yao and said that the graduation project was not only hard for you, but also very tiring for the tutor. But our teacher Yao has never made a statement. In the end, this matter went away. Personally, I think it is wrong for students to express their dissatisfaction with teachers, attack teachers' lives, and call names in groups. The person who does not respect the teacher in this way is himself. . .

Back to the topic, the students' behavior is very wrong, but the counselor's own language is also disrespectful to the students, and he also threatens and so on. As a counselor, he could have handled it calmly, but if he had to make such a big fuss, it would not have a good end for himself.

In addition, it is not a day or two for counselors in universities to give or cancel scholarships at will according to their own preferences and evaluate students at will.

If you have different opinions, please leave a comment below ~

Primary school, junior high school and senior high school have always been obedient and serious. When I was a freshman, because the school asked freshmen to do morning exercises every day, once it rained, everyone insisted on going. Later, the counselor took a photo of it. Because of the persistence of our class, the department set an example to praise and the counselor won the prize. I think this is normal. Since the department stipulates doing morning exercises and it is good for learning and health, we should stick to it. Besides, it didn't rain much that day. It just rained a little in Mao Mao. Until some students complain: counselors are really nothing, let's train in the rain for our own honor! At that moment, my three views were shaken! I'm born after 80, and now all the people who go to college are born after 00. Their thinking is probably more radical than my generation.

Simple evaluation: this tour guide is arrogant with a little power in his hand and deserves to be beaten. There are not many such people in colleges and universities, but they are just a small administrative staff, teaching students like children, and no one wants to listen. The funniest thing is that I went to Tencent headquarters to find an anonymous person, a little counselor, who cares? You need some skills to scare students.

When I saw the news, I was deeply moved. When I was in college, some students' attitude towards guides had risen to popularity. Although QQ was used many years ago, it has not reached the point of publicly insulting tour guides in QQ groups. Is there really a story between teachers and students, or is the quality of students getting lower and lower?

In all fairness, combined with the actual situation I encountered in university, university is no longer a simple high school and junior high school, but a small society full of social elements. University teachers, especially instructors, not only know how to teach and educate people like high school teachers, but even have many different ideas. For example, I experienced in college that tutors often need students to pay bribes to get scholarships and other rewards. Or take advantage of students through various forms, the relationship between college students and tutors is no longer a relationship in which junior high schools and high schools only know how to teach and educate people. Of course, we can't shoot them. I believe there are still many good teachers in college life.

In this campus conflict, because the news didn't explain the reason, we can't know why the teacher's normal questions will bring the students' bad words, but I believe that there was some kind of conflict between the teacher and the students before, which finally broke out at this moment, but we don't know the reason of the earliest conflict, but as students, we confront the teacher in this form in public chat software. At the very least, respecting teachers has disappeared at this moment. At least on campus, it's a pity to see such a situation. The minimum moral etiquette between teachers and students has reached the lowest point.

The latest news is that the teacher has contacted Tencent to try to find out the information of anonymous students who abused the teacher, but Tencent has not made any reply. Maybe they will only handle the whole incident in this way. After all, this has little to do with Tencent. The biggest problem lies in the teachers and students of this university. If the barriers and contradictions between teachers and students are not resolved, the same conflict may occur no matter which network platform you switch to!

Objectively speaking, both of them have problems. First of all, it is definitely wrong for students not to train, and it is definitely wrong to scold teachers anonymously. Anyone with a little principle and self-cultivation will not do this. If you have any dissatisfaction, you can't make it clear, not like a villain.

Secondly, the teacher's handling behind the scenes is also wrong. It is empty talk to contact Tencent without thinking, and it is too arbitrary to deprive the students who made this dynamic event of the right to obtain scholarships and appraisals. Not like a teacher, more like an official. Not only can it not solve the problem, but it is more likely to cause students' dissatisfaction. I think this is a problem in many schools now. Students are not like students and teachers are not like teachers. The road to education has a long way to go.

Do you like the above personal views? (* *)?

Let's summarize the events first. Many people don't participate in phalanx training. Counselors also said that there were cases of admission, and compulsory training was unpopular.

In this case, some students sent anonymous expressions to the counselors, and their words were indecent.

Counselors broke out, started the mutual aid mode, and even scolded and threatened to find anonymous students. Finally, the counselor moved out the legal documents, assisted by the class cadres, and exercised their rights to intimidate anonymous students.

This is what I saw. There are three problems exposed here.

First, the activities organized by the school have not been fully supported and understood by students, and there are cases of designated or compulsory participation, which are resisted by students. This shows that school leaders are too bureaucratic, simple and rude. Students are neither employees nor slaves. The activities that students need to participate in should be divided in advance to arouse their enthusiasm, and an incentive mechanism should be established, based on students' wishes, and not blindly enforced.

Second, students may be really afraid of hardship and fatigue, unwilling to contribute to the collective, and their sense of collective honor is not strong. However, this problem can only be solved by ideological persuasion, and it will only be counterproductive to let students have a sense of collective honor through education rather than forced attendance.

Third, and most importantly, people's teachers and educators must be strict with themselves and set an example for students ideologically. On the other hand, after being provoked by the students, the instructors did not think carefully about the cause and effect, immediately broke out, scolded the students, then pretended to be teachers and threatened the students with their rights. It makes people feel arrogant and helpless, sad and ridiculous. So how can a teacher be a teacher and guide students correctly in thought?

Counselors can be dismissed.