How to treat all kinds of black materials?

On this issue, how to say it? I'm not a fan of the book "The Master of Magic Way", but I'm not a black fan either. I'm just a passerby. From a passer-by's point of view, it is human nature that book lovers must be extremely uncomfortable when their favorite books are reviled and hacked. If the book powder chooses to fight against the black powder, using tough measures, such as back scolding, will inevitably lead to a scolding war. And the quality problems caused by this scolding war will make your favorite books black. For the book powder, it is really angry and helpless to face the hacking of his favorite "The Father of the Magic Way".

In fact, many books will be hacked, because everyone will have everyone's opinion, and people who have bad opinions on the book Magic Wizard may hack him. In my opinion, the book Father of the Magic Way does have its own bright spot, which is worthy of recognition, but many sprayers will also seize its shortcoming, that is, melting stalks. Black powder is very extreme to the word "melt stem", and even thinks it is plagiarism, and plagiarism is very serious. Of course, fans of The Master of Magic will not buy it.

I'm not a professional and I don't know how to explain it. Can only express personal opinions (dislike).

Presumably, everyone should know about this kind of thing. Duplicate checking is allowed to have a coincidence rate. What is duplicate checking? Is it context? I don't think so

The initial identification of plagiarism is to look at the palette. How do you make the color palette? By comparing words?

But what about melting stalks? What does the stem melt by? Melting stems proves plagiarism by extracting similarity, but this is a bit, um, embarrassing. Many plots are condensed to describe only a few plots, and the order is actually very important. How can this statement hold water?

In short, in my opinion, if you don't like it, you don't like it, but don't spray it and treat it rationally.