I went back to my hometown a few days ago to confirm my rights. I saw people in the countryside rushing to build. Are these homesteads valuable?

As a township cadre, I am honored to be invited to answer this question. I will talk about my views from the following two points. The value of rural homestead is not worth mentioning for the time being, but it is absolutely not true that rural people are rushing to build houses now. There are ten villages in our town, two of which are located in Qinling Canyon Road. Because of geological disasters, these two villages belong to flood-stricken areas, enjoy the relocation policy, and basically moved to the periphery of the county. In the other eight villages, except for the renovation of dilapidated houses of poor households in recent years, there are few new houses in the past decade, and the most is to renovate and repair the old houses that are about to collapse. Usually, except for the elderly and children, there are very few young and middle-aged people. It is really a hollow village. Buying a house in the city has almost become a necessity for farmers. It doesn't matter if the old man can't enter the city, but there is no house in the city. Marrying a daughter-in-law must be marijuana. ?

For a long time, there is little room for the appreciation of rural homesteads, even if there is, it is only urban villages and suburbs. There used to be a joke that there was a poor village and many people couldn't get married. One day, two young people in the village drew a red circle on the row of houses on the roadside, and the word "demolition" was written on the red circle. In less than two years, there were no bachelors in the village. Jokes are jokes, but the demolition of nouveau riche is indeed a common phenomenon in recent years. However, the demolition of nouveau riche has nothing to do with the worthless rural homestead, but only with the demolition, or to be precise, only with the demolition of urban suburbs. If it is not demolished, even the homestead in the suburbs of the city will always be as worthless as the courtyard with the door locked all the year round in the hollow village, leaving a way out for the failure to enter the city at most. Otherwise, the combination of villages and houses in Shandong and other places will not have such a big response.

In short, whether it is a contracted land or a homestead, as long as the nature of ownership remains unchanged, the right to use it is worthless, or it will not be very valuable. Of course, if the ownership belongs to farmers and they are allowed to buy and sell, they will fall into the strange circle of repeated land mergers for thousands of years, and farmers have no advantage. A rural house with superior location, with two floors, is worth 6,543.8+0,000 to 6,543.8+0.5 million yuan. First, 400,000 sets should be built and 200,000 sets should be renovated in rural areas. In addition, if the homestead is less than1000000, farmers are not willing to pay. (refers to rural houses located around the city. Second, the house in the countryside sold 2 million, and the people in the city did not buy it. Because the rural homestead is collectively owned, it is not appropriate for anyone to buy 2 million now and sell it to a third person later. Even if it is not sold, it will be treated as an inheritance and even cause controversy. Unless it's a ancestral home, most people don't want to spend 2 million yuan to take the risk that it is impossible to recover the cost. ?

Third, the collective ownership and land nature of the homestead have solidified the residential function of the homestead, and it is even more impossible to allow real estate speculation to circulate. Fourth, even if the real estate license is obtained, it is generally only used for farmers' loans. If the transaction and demolition compensation occur in the future, the law does not support the buyers to get compensation, and the original farmer owners have the right to sign for compensation. Closed the compensation space for demolition.