Teaching slogans with loudspeakers

Is it a sin for a teacher to lecture with his mouth?

Among parents, there is a voice that is becoming more and more serious:

"Why do teachers use loudspeakers in class? Is the teacher lecturing or the machine lecturing? "

"What if the speaker is too loud and damages my child's hearing?"

Teachers' use of loudspeakers in class was questioned and complained by parents, calling it "violation of teachers' ethics"

The teacher was reported by his parents for using a megaphone in class, and the parents questioned the teacher's serious violation of the teacher's ethics.

Don't be surprised, this is a real thing, and there is more than one such thing.

With the development of media equipment and network, the form of teachers' lectures has changed greatly, not only the teaching conditions have been improved, but also the emerging media equipment has entered the teaching work.

For example, projectors and multimedia courseware are not only convenient for students to understand, but also greatly improve efficiency.

But there is one thing that parents strongly resist, and that is the "megaphone" used by teachers during lectures.

Many parents think that the teacher's use of "megaphone" is a kind of lazy and irresponsible performance, purely for their own convenience and effort.

Moreover, long-term use of loud speakers is also a great damage to students' hearing. Students in the front row bear the brunt. Secondly, wherever the teacher goes, the speaker will ring and the students' ears will be "destroyed".

This statement has also been supported by many parents. If all teachers use loudspeakers, students' ears will be "damaged" for 65,438+02 years or even longer, so they respond to teachers' "dismantling" loudspeakers, or even report directly to the school.

However, some parents think that this statement is "finding bones in eggs", not to mention that not all teachers need to use loudspeakers, and the volume of loudspeakers is only 60-75 decibels, which is not enough to seriously affect students' listening.

If there is any influence, shouldn't the teacher who uses it have the greatest influence?

Moreover, it is really a "helpless move" for teachers to wear loudspeakers. At present, there are too many students in many school classes, with 60, 70 or even more students in one class. As long as the teacher whispers, the students behind him may not hear.

In addition to the large class capacity, the teachers' curriculum is also very full, and some teachers are full of classes all morning and afternoon. The high-frequency use of voice really makes teachers "unbearable".

Needless to say, teachers often answer some questions for students after class, which makes the teacher's throat unable to rest at all, and pharyngitis is serious.

Isn't it a responsible performance for teachers to use loudspeakers? How can you say that a teacher "violates the teacher's ethics"?

This statement by parents really makes many teachers chilling. Teachers' use of loudspeakers can be linked to teachers' morality. Isn't this a kind of "moral kidnapping"?

People always compare teachers to "silent burning candles", which illuminate others and burn themselves. But teachers are human beings, can't they be a "light"? When you illuminate others, you can also be saved.

In this era of developed network, teachers' every move can be said to be under the "monitoring" of parents. With a little carelessness, teachers are pushed to the edge of morality and are at the forefront. Under the supervision of parents, what the teacher did became wrong.

If parents really support the previous "traditional" teaching model, then the previous "going to school" was called "reading", and the teacher should be very devout, not the current teacher-student relationship. Teaching is more like a service industry, and teachers are more like service personnel. The relationship between teachers and students has long been different.

The teacher's use of loudspeakers was resisted by parents. In the final analysis, this matter is still a question of trust between teachers and parents. Parents have a crisis of trust in teachers and don't believe that teachers are really good to students. Then what teachers do can always be "seen" by parents.

Teaching and educating people is a teacher's duty, but it is not a "crime" for teachers to lecture with loudspeakers. I hope that parents with this idea can relax their sensitive nerves, be more tolerant and understanding to teachers, and create a good learning atmosphere for their children.

PS: The pictures in this article are all from the Internet and have been deleted.