Debate question! (high score solution)

money, with it, humble people become noble! Poor people become rich! Ugly people become beautiful! Incompetent people become powerful! Rich people become more respectful and greedy!

it's just something with all the magic! Everything, everything! Without it, society can't function. Without it, people have to return to primitive society.

At home, many people yearn for the western thought and culture in their ideas, but when they arrive abroad, they will immediately feel that what is more shocking and attractive than the thought and culture is the western material world as the basis of that thought and culture.

But to be honest, many China students finally stay overseas, obviously not only because of the attraction of "democracy and freedom" in western countries, but also because of the "material temptation" in developed societies.

obviously, pursuing a better material life should not be a sin.

China traditional culture has always regarded the temptation of material as a kind of corrosion to people's spirit. Since Confucius set an example of Yan Hui's "living in poverty and enjoying happiness" and issued the declaration of "letting wealth and fame drift by like clouds", China people have always regarded "being poor and self-controlled" as a rare moral realm.

In fact, material life has another influence on people's spiritual world.

Before going abroad, I interviewed an old economist who was a disciple of Mr. Wang Yanan who translated Marx's Das Kapital. After attacking China's bureaucracy for a while, the old man told me that it is difficult for people to have any sense of democracy and freedom under the condition of socialist economy shortage. To buy something on the street, you must have a ticket, beg a salesman and go through the back door. This daily commodity trading activity invisibly strengthens the individual's dependence on the government and society and shapes human servility.

after I arrived in the United States, I found that the old economist's argument can be confirmed from another aspect. The richness of western materials has made people have a strong sense of choice since childhood. From daily commodities to future careers, from lifestyle to political parties and politicians, personal choice rights are often regarded as a matter of course. The individual's right to choose is essentially the most basic meaning of freedom and democracy.

Take the "American Dream" that people often talk about. The "American Dream" is first of all a very materialistic dream: a house-a house means family, children, cars, dogs and a stable job. However, some American scholars have emphasized that this materialized "American Dream" contains an American spirit: everyone has the right to pursue personal happiness and can realize his dreams in life through personal efforts.

Therefore, facing the material world of western society, China students are not only tempted by material things, but also influenced by a kind of spirit.

The establishment of "money consciousness" of China students is based on their experience of "poverty" after going abroad. It is under the ruthless squeeze of the feeling of "poverty" that the importance of money is quickly highlighted. The reason is very simple. In western society, if you don't have money, even if you are full of freedom, you don't have much freedom to enjoy. Even if everyone is equal, you won't get much respect. When I was a child, I learned the moral maxim: "Money is not necessarily happiness". After going abroad, I can understand it from the opposite side: "No money is definitely not happiness".

China is a poor country, but since 1949, China people living in it have not felt so deeply about poverty. At that time, the poverty of the whole country increased people's sense of equality. But when we get overseas, China people really feel how poor they are and how poor our country is. It seems that the Chinese nation can add "poverty" to "diligence" and "courage".

Many self-funded international students have spent many years saving only enough to buy a one-way ticket from China to the United States, and when they get off the plane, they often have nothing left in their pockets. No matter what you study is astrophysics or literary aesthetics, you have to go into China restaurant to wash dishes before you pretend to discuss academic issues in class. When some professors who are well-known in China go abroad as visiting scholars, they often have to live in other people's living rooms or buy some old clothes at flea markets because of the money problem, which can't be said to be the level treatment of full professors.

A 48-year-old female visiting scholar studying in a university in new york, who came to the United States not long ago, began to have toothache and wanted to have her teeth extracted. But her medical insurance doesn't cover dentists, so everyone advised her to put up with it, because it is surprisingly expensive to see dentists in America. After two days' forbearance, the female visiting scholar couldn't stand the pain any more, and vowed, "No matter how much it costs, this tooth will be pulled out." So, everyone drove her there. Along the way, she kept covering her teeth and whining. When the car jerked, it was called pain. When I arrived at the hospital, the doctor had not seen it. As soon as I heard the registration fee, the female visiting scholar immediately asked to go home. On the way back, strangely enough, I didn't shout a toothache again.

the deeper you feel about poverty, the stronger you feel about the importance of money. But in a deeper sense, the real establishment of "money consciousness" of China students is actually the result of another "cultural shock".

China society before 199s was essentially a power society. The basis of determining the relationship between people is a person's position and power in his society or family, and the whole society is also running around the axis of power. In this social environment, money can certainly make kids push the mill, but it doesn't always lead the spirit.

America is a real money society. There, money, like an invisible hand, drives the society to turn. This is a "mobile" society: there are no nobles and civilians, no upper and lower classes, only rich people and poor people. However, rich people may gradually lose money, while people without money may gradually gain money.

In the summer of p>199, organized by the School of Political Studies at the University of California, Berkeley, I went to Washington for a "field trip" with the summer seminar on "American Politics and Policy". There, we visited a law firm specializing in congressional lobbying. We were received by lawyer Kurzweil, one of the main partners of the firm. During the discussion, the professional lobbyist, who was in his prime, had a straight suit and didn't want to hide how smart he was, told everyone straight away: "All the problems in the United States are ultimately a Dollar problem. Any change, whether it is the passage of a law, the election of a member of parliament or the judgment of a case, ultimately means that the dollar is transferred from the pockets of some people to the pockets of others. "

Indeed, in the United States, money can not only influence politics and economy, but also become a standard of value judgment, and even gradually penetrate into people's way of thinking.

In the early 199s, former US President George W. Bush officially announced a nationwide anti-drug campaign on TV. There were no slogans, no slogans, and no mobilization meeting. The main action taken by Bush was to ask Congress to pass a budget with tens of millions of dollars for anti-drug funds. This scene is similar to the irony of 1992 presidential candidate Perot in NBC's "Weekend Nightlife" program: the Texas billionaire's solution to the racial riots in Los Angeles is to send a check to Los Angeles and then announce that the problems in Los Angeles have been completely solved.

American society is like a big rotating machine that keeps making money and swallowing it. All people, whether businessmen or scholars, politicians or ordinary people, as long as they live in this society for a long time, they will be involuntarily involved in it and can't stop.

A 35-year-old visiting scholar, after arriving in the United States, does nothing, does not visit, does not ask or learn, and works every day to earn money. He said that his initial goal was to save enough 1 thousand. I can earn enough 1 thousand, but I want to save 2 thousand and 3 thousand. As a result, I couldn't stop, so I kept playing. As far as arguments are concerned, you are obviously at a disadvantage! There are few so-called fatal problems that can kill each other.

the only thing you need to do is how to argue!

you should emphasize the practical significance of money, and don't get too entangled in each other's problems. Otherwise, you will fall into the trap set by the other party. Don't let them lead you by the nose. Being passive, even if you are positive, you are likely to lose. So you should try to gain the initiative. Take control of the rhythm in your own hands. This is likely to win!

the debate focuses on the debate, not on the right or wrong of the argument.

You can search baidu and google for the practical significance of money to our lives, such as "money is not everything, but you can't do anything without money". The other party may hit back and say, "The other party has said that money is not everything. Has it already affirmed our view that life is beautiful because of honesty?" At this time, you have to explain that the beauty of life mainly lies in money. "We have not denied that honesty plays a non-dominant role in life!" Then you will cling to this point. Avoid misleading each other. Ha, it's a bit stubborn and unreasonable, but sometimes the debate is like this. )

I just finished the debate. Indeed, participating in the debate can give people a good exercise. Eloquence, appearance, way of thinking, psychological quality and so on, take it seriously! I wish you a good play! Never mind winning or losing.

also, the effective cooperation of the four players is very important. You should strengthen communication.

why must money be covered with copper?

Only with money can we have such an orderly economic society.

It can be said that with money, large-scale transactions and free transactions are possible.

Imagine what our life would be like if we were still in a barter society.

There will be no mass production in factories

People will constantly exchange with each other for the same necessities of life

The invention of money is a manifestation of social progress

Our present social prosperity is based on this kind of money.

It doesn't mean that we don't need to be honest for money.

Honesty is also very important, but we can't deny the promotion of money to our lives because of the subjective influence and the social devaluation of money.

The endless convenience brought by money can't be concealed by the greed and strong possession of individuals.

Moreover, the negative impact of money is not brought by itself.

It is caused by people's insatiable greed.

We can't blame money for performing its duties. Money itself has no attributes, but people's thoughts have given it other connotations.

In a word: money is not everything, but there is no money.

If there is no money in life, only honesty, you may get sick and starve to death. But without honesty, you will be shamed by others. It's better to have both.

first of all, I'd like to point out that an upstairs one can be regarded as the worst policy. There are three problems to guide everyone and each other to work hard on "beauty": first, to extend beauty to quality, morality is no longer narrow, and the positive side can easily refute this point. Second, this topic cannot be used repeatedly, because it has little to do with the core of the proposition, and it is easy for the other party to attack the opposing party with "charges" such as stealing concepts. Third, if we follow that brother's opinion and extend it to what productive forces are, then the positive side can turn the subject to subjective initiative and so on, and then say that productive forces are created by people, not money. Well, the next thing for the opposing side to do may be to argue with the positive side on this topic that is far from the point, without any achievements.

In addition, there is no secret weapon in debate, and there is no magic weapon to win. In careful preparation, there will also be a hundred secrets. You can never know 1% what the other person is thinking, because the only thing you can be sure of is that the other person is also thinking about how you plan and then "start" according to your plan. So just consider what kind of "counterattack" you may encounter in your preparation, instead of imagining what your opponent is preparing.

I wanted to continue, but I was really impatient ... Who wrote this debate? This fellow has no idea what an argument is. There is no contradiction at all in this debate. There is no conflict between the core of these two topics: money and honesty.

the essence and core of the so-called debate is: to argue without seeking truth. Therefore, the debate must meet at least two basic requirements: first, it is not a question of "right and wrong", and the double opposition of the debate must start a debate on a right and wrong issue that does not matter. For example, the classic debate topic in the national college debate competition "Men/women need more care". Otherwise, one of them will be obviously passive. Second, there must be opposites and contradictions in the debate, and there are no obvious conflicts and differences. How can we argue? It's not pleasant to say. Your debate requires the debater to invent and add many subjective things and orientations before it can be argued. This is obviously a public opinion-oriented debate, which sets the opposing side as a negative model to accept the attacks and criticisms of the positive side and the public. Because the opponent must assume many premises before the proposition can be established, and the square can easily point out that the proposition of the opponent is not established if it is based on assumptions through several simple examples, while the square must also support the argument with assumptions, but its assumptions are supported by facts and morality. So, do you think the opposing side is just a target for everyone to laugh at? Seriously speaking, if no one tells you in advance that all you have to do on the court is to fall behind and lose the game to tell you not to "regard money as life", then it will be an out-and-out conspiracy at the expense of the passion of four young people!

if I am the opponent, I will refuse to play unless I change the debate. I will tell the organizers that the opposing side is not a villain and has no obligation to be a typical negative side. The so-called opposing side is only for the positive side. If possible, it is the same for you to call both sides red and white. Please ask the organizers to understand the debate first to organize the debate.

p.s. Are you a university or a middle school? If it's a middle school student, forget it. If it's a college student, I hope you can read my advice. I have been on the debate team for four years in college.

Although honesty is very important, in a word: money is not everything, and money is absolutely impossible.

So, how can we be honest if we spend money? Suppose a job needs honest people to do, but you have no money, which means you have no capital. Why do people look for you?

So, without money, honesty doesn't come to our door.

We are not greedy for money, but without money in our life, it means that you are also living a mediocre life. If you are not mediocre, will you make money?

Life needs the most basic material foundation, and this foundation is money.

With money, humble people become noble! Poor people become rich! Ugly people become beautiful! Incompetent people become powerful! Rich people become more respectful and greedy!

it's just something with all the magic! Everything, everything! Without it, society can't function. Without it, people have to return to primitive society.

work hard on' beauty'!

When debating, lead beauty to a wider range

Beauty does not represent a narrow part of what social morality \ quality

but represents a wider range, such as how money represents productivity and how it becomes a measure of social development, etc.