Pupils should read more positive debate words in extracurricular books.

Pro: It's good to read more extracurricular books. Reading more books can not only help you understand a lot of knowledge, but also accumulate vocabulary, killing two birds with one stone.

Counterparty: It is really beneficial to read less extracurricular books and more books, but if you see books that are not suitable for teenagers, it is not only useless but also harmful.

Pro: reading more books is not necessarily reading bad books and periodicals.

Counterparty: If you read the book and don't understand the deep meaning of the article, it's useless to read it.

Pro: (scratching his head) Read books that are beneficial to you and read more books in the right way. As for those bad books and periodicals, you can totally skip reading them.

Against: (Proud) Children nowadays are curious about everything. What if they read it

Pro: I am twelve years old and have complete self-awareness ability. I don't read useless books.

Counterparty: reading extracurricular books is not necessarily good.

Leon: reading more books is good.

I think reading less extracurricular books. It is true that reading can make people increase their knowledge, cultivate their temperament and cultivate their body and mind, but "more" is only a necessary condition for "reading", not a sufficient condition.

Liu Xiang of the Han Dynasty once said: "Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools." Since books are medicine, they have two functions: first, good medicine will cure diseases; One is poison, which can kill people. Isn't it? In Germany in the 1920s, many people were regarded as Hitler's martyrs because of their bad influence on Mein Kampf. Bad books, like bad friends, may kill you. It's true. Now some students are addicted to martial arts or romance novels, reading those grotesque books all day, and "throwing" their homework aside, which leads to a decline in their academic performance, and finally draw water with a sieve. Just think, can "extracurricular books" like "reading more" be said to be "beneficial"? "A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber." Therefore, to read extracurricular books, we must first read the quality of books.

A philosopher once said that people who can get the necessary nutrition are healthier than those who eat more. At the same time, real scholars are often not people who read, but people who can read. Some people don't think seriously about reading, but just skim it. Some people read books that are not suitable for them, and some people even read books with a curious attitude. How can such "reading" be beneficial?