Illegal construction of public rental housing endangers the safety of private houses.

As an illegal building, it must be an objective and subjective illegal building form. As far as law and practice are concerned, it is generally like this:

1. Illegal buildings are audited according to the different conditions of their own buildings. When the government carries out a project or demolishes a project, it needs to formulate different rights protection schemes and the ultimate pursuit of rights protection. For example, architecture has a long history, which comes from the rationality of everything. The government recognizes language behavior through some behaviors. For this kind of building, we must pursue the same as the legal building, that is, my existence has sufficient historical reasons, and the government nods to admit that it is engaged in practical business or related housing on collective land. The reasonable conditions of the premise are completely sufficient. In this case, in principle, you should protect your legitimate rights and interests through legal construction.

2. If the demolition is illegal, that is to say, even if there is no construction project planning permit, it is illegal. The purpose of demolition is not simple demolition, but demolition, which is to trigger demolition. In particular, some enterprises often encounter this situation when they encounter demolition, that is to say, they either go at a very low price or have no compensation for illegal demolition. If you take up legal weapons and actively pursue them, you will question the legality of the other party's demolition, including the legality of illegal demolition, the delay of legal procedures and the illegality of procedures, so that even if there are some defects in the building during the demolition process, you can still get relevant compensation.

3. Temporary assault construction. Find a piece of land for surprise construction, and the result does not conform to the relevant urban and rural planning, which is very likely to be forcibly demolished. From the historical reasons, from the basis of legitimacy, including the subjective purpose of the building itself, it is not pure. There is a great possibility of this kind of demolition without compensation. In fact, many of them are demolition with little or no compensation.

4, with the help of a policy or a project. Especially in Shanghai and Zhejiang, taking "three changes and one demolition" as an example, if a county wants to demolish 200,000 square meters, it will choose to demolish it without a construction project planning permit. No matter when you built it, whether it is due to historical reasons or business-related behavior, you have to tear it down anyway. The purpose is to complete a task assigned by the government or superiors, because how many square meters must be demolished this year. If you do this, you should take out legal procedures in time and introduce them to the relevant mainstream media for supervision by delaying or questioning. I think these methods are very beneficial to the demolished people and can achieve the effect of safeguarding rights.