How to write Mr. Pan's feelings after reading in difficulties?

Mr. Pan's Thoughts after Reading in Difficulties;

When I came to the classroom today, the teacher said, "Students, let's talk about Miss Pan in distress." Only then did I find that the reading task assigned last week went in one ear and out the other. It is said that onlookers have no right to interrupt, so I have to listen to their thoughts quietly. Among them, some feelings.

Perhaps it is because of the recent article about "Lu Xun" that when Mr. Pan was mentioned, everyone criticized him, saying that he was hypocritical, stingy and vulgar. In a word, it seems that all the terrible words can be successfully applied to him.

Mr. Pan bargained with the driver, so he was very stingy. After hearing the news of the war, Mr. Pan fled to Shanghai with his wife and children, so he was weak. Under the kind recommendation of everyone, Mr. Pan wrote a eulogy slogan for the warlord commander-in-chief, which was so hypocritical.

I want to say that the students did not read from the characters and backgrounds in the works, nor did they read from their own emotions. Instead, I use the so-called "criticism" I learned from my habitual understanding to look at Mr. Pan in trouble. Is your mother a stingy and hypocritical person who bargains with vegetable vendors in the vegetable market?

Mr. Pan fled with his family and his future was uncertain. The whole family is counting on him to have a wallet. When a person has nothing to worry about in the world, he has nothing to do with others when he is alone. He can be noble, noble, heroic and dedicated, and he can defend some high-flying things with death. But Mr. Pan is not alone. He is a family, and his wife and son are part of him.

He is a responsible person for his family! Don't run away, don't put the lives of your wife and children in the war? If you don't bargain, the war may burn his livelihood. If you don't go back to school, there will only be a few openings at home. Can air feed you? What I see is a painful and hard-working father and husband. Mr. Pan's suffering is the sum of the suffering of his wife and his children, plus the suffering he should have suffered. It's suffering!

I don't know when people will only see "criticism", "exposure" and "satire" in their works. The people in the works are hypocritical and feudal, and Teacher Pan is just an ordinary person, just a drop in the ocean. No one can force him to die until he swears to the land. Is he a husband or a father? What he can do is to lead his family to live a good life.

He did it after all. If Mr. Pan, originally written in the article, is a heroic martyr who does not escape or hide and mobilizes the whole family to fight to the death with the enemy, it will be chilling from a modern perspective! We shouldn't stand outside and evaluate any work in a high-profile tone, as if we look down on others and say, "stupid humans, you are really unbearable."

It is to integrate into the emotional world and society of the protagonist and treat some characters in combination with their own times. After all, the era of discovering that personal value is not egoism and abandoning oneself to complete society has passed.

To criticize Teacher Pan is to criticize parents' responsibilities to their children and husbands' responsibilities to their wives. If honor and disgrace and * * * are virtues, then it is better for Mr. Pan to bear the humiliation of many people.