How to deal with the false accusation against the discipline inspection and supervision organs

How to deal with the false accusation and frame-up against the discipline inspection and supervision organs, we must first clarify the definition and seriousness of false accusation and frame-up. False accusation and frame-up refers to the act of deliberately fabricating false facts and reporting others to the discipline inspection and supervision organs or other relevant departments with the intention of subjecting others to disciplinary action or criminal investigation. This kind of behavior not only violates the legitimate rights and interests of the reported person, but also interferes with the normal working order of the discipline inspection and supervision organs.

First, the discipline inspection and supervision organs should immediately investigate after receiving false accusations and reports.

Discipline inspection and supervision organs should attach great importance to it and immediately organize personnel to investigate and verify it after receiving false accusations and reports. In the process of investigation, evidence should be fully collected, including the statement of the informant, the defense of the defendant and the testimony of relevant witnesses. At the same time, it is also necessary to fully understand the work, life and social situation of the reported person, so as to judge the authenticity and credibility of the reported content.

Second, deal with false accusations seriously.

After investigation and verification, it is confirmed that the informant has made false accusations and framed acts, and the discipline inspection and supervision organs shall severely deal with those who have made false accusations and framed them according to laws and regulations. Handling methods include but are not limited to: disciplinary action, transfer to judicial organs for criminal responsibility, etc. Seriously dealing with those who falsely accuse and frame can not only safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the reported person, but also demonstrate the zero tolerance attitude of the discipline inspection and supervision organs towards false accusations and frames.

Three, strengthen publicity and education, improve public awareness of false accusations.

In order to prevent and reduce the occurrence of false accusation and frame-up, the discipline inspection and supervision organs should also strengthen publicity and education to raise the public's awareness of false accusation and frame-up. Through the publicity of relevant laws and regulations and typical cases, we will guide the public to establish a correct concept of reporting, enhance legal awareness and moral concepts, and consciously resist and prevent false accusations and frame-ups.

To sum up:

Discipline inspection and supervision organs should adhere to the principle of fairness and justice when dealing with false accusations and framed cases, not only to protect the legitimate rights and interests of informants, but also to maintain the working order of discipline inspection and supervision organs. By strengthening investigation and verification, seriously dealing with false accusations and framers, and strengthening publicity and education, the occurrence of false accusations and framers can be effectively prevented and reduced, providing a strong guarantee for creating a clean and upright political ecology.

Legal basis:

People's Republic of China (PRC) supervision law

Article 65 provides that:

The supervisory organ and its staff have one of the following acts, and the responsible leaders and the directly responsible personnel shall be dealt with according to law; If the case constitutes a crime, criminal responsibility shall be investigated according to law:

(a) without approval, authorization to dispose of clues, found that major cases are not reported, or privately retained and handled the materials involved;

(2) interfering in the investigation by taking advantage of the influence of authority or position to seek personal gain by taking advantage of the case;

(three) illegal theft, disclosure of investigation information, or disclosure of reporting matters, reporting acceptance and informer information;

(4) extorting confessions by torture or insulting, beating, abusing or corporal punishment in disguised form against the person under investigation or the person involved;

(five) in violation of the provisions of the seizure, seizure and freezing of property;

(six) in violation of the provisions on the handling of safety accidents, or after the occurrence of safety accidents, concealing, misrepresenting or improper handling;

(seven) in violation of the provisions of the lien measures;

(8) restricting others from leaving the country in violation of regulations, or failing to lift the exit restrictions in accordance with regulations;

(nine) other acts of abuse of power, dereliction of duty, favoritism.