After reading 800 words to build a happy China, hurry! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

"Wu Yue Chun Qiu" said: "The people are rich and the country is strong, and the people are peaceful and harmonious." Before "the people are rich and the country is strong", the ancients put forward the idea of "people-oriented" as early as 1000 years ago. The reform that began more than 30 years ago has made China's economy enter the forefront of the world, and also made "development first" the primary goal that has remained unchanged for more than 30 years. However, the rapid growth of GDP has not brought about the simultaneous prosperity of the people, and the excessive income gap has become a problem after development, and the goal of scientific development has gradually drifted away. At the Fifth Plenary Session of the Seventeenth Central Committee held in June, 5438+ 10, "the income of urban and rural residents generally increased rapidly" was set as one of the main development goals in the next five years. To build a "happy China" and return wealth to the people, we need to truly change from material standard to people standard, and people's wealth is the source of national strength and a topic that needs our continuous attention.

There is little disagreement about what problems exist in China today. What should be done has also been put forward: for example, expanding domestic demand, adjusting structure, rational distribution, paying attention to people's livelihood, social security, sustainable development, etc., which have been officially recognized and written into reports and documents, but most of them have not been effectively implemented. A few years ago, we discussed the transformation of government functions from leading economy to public service. At that time, I said, "Is a service-oriented government good? Right? Yes! But can you do it? Can't do it! Will it work? It won't work! " Why? Development first is China's national policy, leading the economy is the responsibility of the government, and GDP is the assessment target. How do officials become service-oriented through this promotion?

"Scientific development" can't stop the development goals of "development first" and "Eleventh Five-Year Plan", and the required scientific development goals will basically fail. The 11th Five-Year Plan calls for an average annual GDP growth of 7.5%, with an average annual growth of 10. 1% in the four years from 2006 to 2009. If this year's growth is maintained at the level of 8.7% last year, the average annual growth in five years will reach 9.4%. Achieving development goals is a foregone conclusion. However, on the contrary, the scientific development required by the Eleventh Five-Year Plan has not been realized, and even deteriorated, reaching a critical point.

For example, the 11th Five-Year Plan calls for adjusting the relationship between investment and consumption. Therefore, China has the highest investment rate and the lowest consumption rate in the world. The 11th Five-Year Plan calls for accelerating the transformation of economic growth mode. Therefore, China's economic dependence on foreign countries and energy consumption level of output value are the first in the world. The 11th Five-Year Plan requires all people to enjoy the fruits of reform and development. As a result, China's fiscal revenue accounts for the highest proportion of GDP in the world, while its fiscal expenditure on people's livelihood is the lowest and its administrative expenditure is the highest in the world. The 11th Five-Year Plan calls for maintaining social stability, and as a result, mass incidents continue, from 65,438+6,000 in 0995 to 60,000 in 2007 and then to 230,000 in 2009.

As a banner of the current Central Committee, why can't "scientific development" stop "development first"?

"Development first" means that economic development is the most important, and everything else is secondary. In other words, it doesn't matter how to make the cake bigger, whether the growth mode is reasonable, how to distribute it, and whether the distribution mode is fair. Therefore, when talking about "scientific development", we cannot "develop first"; "Development first" is not "scientific development". However, "development first" is Deng Xiaoping's national policy, so the interpretation of "scientific development" must be consistent with "development first". Explaining what Scientific Outlook on Development is, the report of the 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China said: "Scientific Outlook on Development, the first priority is development, and the core is people-oriented." "Development first" is a material-based value, which puts material growth in the first place and ignores the growth mode and the distribution of material achievements. "People-oriented" is a people-oriented value, not to abandon things, but to conform to the people-oriented development model and the concept of distributing the fruits of things. People-oriented is scientific development. Here, "development first" and "people-oriented" are compared for governments at all levels to choose. GDP assessment is hard and "people-oriented" is empty. As a result, the goal of development has been realized and the goal of scientific development has been frustrated.