Is it feasible to "provide for the aged with housing" in China?

Of course it's not feasible, because the house was originally used for living, not for investment, which is always emphasized by everyone, so if you pretend to use the house to support the elderly at this time, I think it's an unrealistic idea.

For a long time, many people have been very concerned about the problem of houses. People who have houses will pay attention to whether their houses appreciate, while those who don't have houses will pay special attention to the price of houses, because house prices will affect one's quality of life and even one's residence. Therefore, in this case, houses are used for living, not for speculation. This is the basic idea that we must make clear.

Many people think that houses are used for the aged, which is a misunderstanding.

In China society, many middle-aged and elderly people think that houses are used for providing for the elderly. They think that houses are especially valuable, and at the same time they can represent a sense of security. I think this idea is not wrong, but we can't look at the problems of houses from the previous perspective now, because houses no longer have so many commodity attributes, and as a hard currency, there are some ambiguities. In the past, the price of the house basically changed every year, and even the increase in some places could reach more than 1% every year. However, with the regulation of the housing price policy in recent years, we can see that the house will return to its own value more and more.

It is not feasible to provide for the aged with housing in China.

Let's put it this way: houses are originally used for living, not for speculation. This concept will be more and more deeply rooted in people's hearts. At the same time, more and more people will no longer regard houses as direct investment products, which means that there will be fewer and fewer speculators. At the same time, citizens who really need them will buy houses that suit them and will not make any speculation about them. Therefore, under such circumstances, there will be some problems in the liquidity of houses themselves, and many second-hand houses will go to the market. Under such circumstances, it may be unrealistic if your dresser sells the house in the future.

The house is a matter of security.

at this time, some people will think, can't the house be used for their own living? Indeed, owning your own house is a matter of security, because many people will think too much about the investment nature of the house in the process of buying a house, thinking about selling it in the future, and this idea may fail. If you just regard the house as your own place to live, you can use it to support the elderly. This is not contradictory. I just want to remind those who want to accumulate wealth by speculating on the house that the mobile value of the house will be lower and lower in the future and can only be used by residents themselves.