Professor Tsinghua University pointed out four language problems on the ID card. Have you noticed them?

The ID card can be said to be our most important document. Whether it's work, business or ticket purchase, it needs to be used. The ID card is the verification of Chinese citizens, distributed by the state and an important document, and the design of the ID card will definitely be reviewed. Therefore, no one doubts that there is anything wrong with the ID card. However, Professor Wang of Tsinghua University pointed out that there are four obvious mistakes in our ID cards. If ordinary people point out that our ID cards are wrong, it may be regarded as a joke. Professor Wang is not ordinary. He is not only a professor in Tsinghua University, but also a senior educator in the Ministry of Education. Deputy Governor and Secretary-General's Award for Preschool Teachers in Primary and Secondary Schools. Of course, such experts will not inspire rivers. In his speech, he pointed out the four languages on the ID card:

One: The front of the ID card reads: China People's Identity Card and China People's Identity Card, and the defender (one side of the head) is "citizenship" (I always thought that before this, the head portrait was front, and one side of the national emblem was on the other side, so I don't know how many boys are like me). Then the question comes: Is it a "resident" or a "citizen"? Citizens and residents have different concepts and live in the territory of China people. Citizens are citizens of China and China, and this citizen is called a constitutional citizen.

In other words, residents are not necessarily citizens. If foreigners live in our country, they can only be called residents, not citizens. Our ID cards are only issued to citizens and passports are only issued to foreigners living in China, so Professor Wang thinks that ID cards should be called "citizen ID cards" instead of "resident ID cards".

"Born" comes after the third line. Professor Wang thinks that this statement is incorrect and accurate, and it should be the date of birth. The concept of birth is relatively broad, such as birth, birth family and so on. This statement throws two words, which is not strict.

Three of them: in the last line of hairband, the expression of "citizenship number" is inaccurate. Professor Wang believes that the number 18 is not a number of citizens, and citizens themselves are not numbers. This number is the number of the ID card and should be expressed as "citizen ID number" instead of "citizen ID card". Finally, Professor Wang also thinks that the expression of the validity period of the ID card is incorrect. For example, a long-term valid identity card is expressed as: validity period: long-term. The validity period should be "from a certain day to a certain day". "If it takes a long time, it should be expressed as long-term effectiveness. As a senior educator, Professor Wang observes problems very carefully. We usually see ID cards every day. There is no such problem, or at our level, we may not think it is a problem. Professor Wang has published it and has different opinions on the Internet. Some people think that these minor problems are in line with our daily use habits and will not affect the use of ID cards. Some people also gave their own understanding of the problems pointed out by Professor Wang.

For example, if it is effective for a long time, it should be changed from "once a day" to "death" in the conventional way. If you write like this, it is obviously impossible. If people see such ID cards every day, what kind of emotions will they have? So there is no big problem in the growing period, and everyone can understand the meaning.