A sign of the emergence of a new class

According to Marx, class refers to the social and political identity formed by economic relations, especially the possession of means of production, at a certain stage of human social development. This political identity refers to a group of people, a group of people who strive to safeguard their own economic interests. Its characteristic is that the possession of the means of production is a fait accompli, and this situation can only be achieved through revolution.

In modern China, from a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society, under the influence of the extreme form of world politics and economy (capitalist expansion and invasion of other countries to gain benefits), it won the victory of War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and directly entered the socialist society. According to Marx's theory, the peasants in China put down their hoes and started their machines, becoming the working class. Can an illiterate person sit in the president's office in a formal suit and become president? If you can become a new class just by putting down the hoe and starting the machine, can a farmer become an emperor by wearing a yellow robe? Definitely not. Just because farmers who have lived in feudal society for generations have the opportunity to enter factories and become workers does not mean that they are working class. They haven't experienced ideological innovation, and they don't realize how difficult it is to grow up and realize their personal values. Look at the French Revolution. The drought in France 1788 made people miserable. What kind of sharp contradiction made people capture the national prison (Bastille)? This revolution can be said to have subverted history. After the baptism of blood and fire in 4 1 year, it was the oppressed people who cried out their souls in the dark and dared to give their lives before they completed the French Revolution and gained a new life. If we can't trigger a new thought and ideology from the ideological level from the inside out, what is the fundamental driving force for social change and occupation of means of production and material wealth?

It can't be regarded as the emergence of a new class. It hasn't experienced the social and ideological changes brought about by the people's thorough economic changes, and has not changed its innovative consciousness from the heart, thus further triggering the process of generating new cooperative groups and new classes.

In my opinion, in the historical process, the emergence of every new class must go through a situation that must be changed in practice. Only by reaching a new height in their inner understanding of the world outlook and having the means of production and material wealth that match their consciousness can they be regarded as a real new class.