Case 0 in Haining, Zhejiang Province is a vagrant. Does this patient zero need to bear legal responsibility?

Case 0 in Haining, Zhejiang Province is a vagrant named Jiang Moumou. Patient zero Jiang Moumou must bear legal responsibility, because his actions have violated relevant laws and regulations, and he also refused to accept the qualification of joint investigation.

With the gradual aggravation of the epidemic in Shanghai, many people are worried that some positive infected people in Shanghai will spill over. In fact, this kind of worry is not unreasonable. After all, the Shanghai municipal government's early control of the epidemic was not so strict. Anyway, Haining found that his patient Zero turned out to be a vagrant, and because the vagrant did not cooperate with the local epidemic prevention and control management, the vagrant had caused a serious spread of the local epidemic. At present, the vagrant has been put on file for investigation.

Patient zero, from Haining, Zhejiang Province, is a vagrant and has been investigated clearly.

Jiang Moumou, patient zero, Haining, is a vagrant. He once entered Haining from a high-risk area but did not report his situation. After the local investigation, Jiang refused to be qualified for joint investigation, and still wandered in many crowded places, which had a serious impact on the local spread of the epidemic. Because of his violation of epidemic prevention and control regulations and other relevant laws, Jiang Moumou has been put on file for investigation, and I believe that the subsequent punishment will be made public. Fortunately, local staff quickly found the source of the epidemic. At present, Jiang's wandering track in Haining has been announced, which can greatly help local citizens to provide epidemic prevention information.

The vagrant Jiang Moumou is suspected of committing a crime and needs to bear legal responsibility.

The vagrant Jiang Moumou should bear legal responsibility. Jiang Moumou is extremely bad subjectively. He knew that he was from a high-risk area but deliberately concealed his itinerary. Objectively refused to cooperate with the epidemic, and at the same time had a negative impact on the spread of the local epidemic. Subjectivity and objectivity are consistent. Jiang's criminal intention is strong, which objectively has also caused adverse effects in the society and undermined the management order of epidemic prevention and control in COVID-19. Jiang Moumou should have been suspected of obstructing the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases, and may eventually bear criminal legal responsibility for his illegal and criminal acts.