The old man was smashed into a vegetable for stealing steel bars, and his family claimed 2 million yuan from the construction site. How is the law handled?

The old man was smashed into a vegetable for stealing steel bars, and his family claimed 2 million yuan a day from the construction site. Ms. Li, who is at work, suddenly received a phone call from the hospital. A few words at the other end of the phone suddenly blinded her: Are you the daughter-in-law of Ren Laohan? Come on, your father-in-law is in the hospital now, and the situation is very serious. Come here quickly. I was fine this morning. Why did I suddenly enter the hospital? Ms. Li has no time to think about it. She put the phone down and ran to the hospital.

When she arrived at the hospital, she found that her father-in-law's injury was more serious than she had expected. Not only intracranial hemorrhage, severe coma and little possibility of awakening, but also amputation is needed, and the follow-up medical expenses are also very expensive. Uncle Ren's family couldn't stop crying when they saw this, because Uncle Ren was over 60 years old and almost 70 years old. How much did he suffer this bad luck?

No, we have to find out what happened. If someone else is "beaten" or something, we have to ask for an explanation. However, because there was no client in the hospital at that time, Ms. Liu listened to other people's opinions and only knew that her father-in-law had an accident at a construction site near his home and was buried under the collapsed wall. It was a cleaning aunt who saw it and called the emergency number, which took people to the hospital.

This allowed Ms. Liu to catch the blind man. Later, it was reminded that it was the police at the police station that made Ms. Liu see hope again. However, when the uncle's family rushed to the police station, they got an unacceptable statement. According to the police records at that time, the police restored the whole process of Uncle Ren's accident through interviews and on-site investigations:

It turned out that Uncle Ren found steel bars in a half-demolished wall at the construction site and wanted to make a little money, so he took some tools to sneak in that day and pushed the wall with a shovel and a sledgehammer to get the steel bars out and sell them. Then something happened. The wall didn't fall to the other side, but to Uncle Ren, who was buried under it and unconscious.

Fortunately, a cleaning aunt happened to pass by, saw something was wrong, and immediately called the emergency number and the alarm number, which took him to the hospital. However, the family members of the elderly do not accept this statement and have been threatening to make the construction company responsible and compensate. Others don't understand. It's good that you sneak in and steal from others and they don't accuse you of stealing. How can you bite back?

As for the construction company, out of humanitarian spirit, after the accident, a person was seriously injured and went to the hospital, and immediately paid the medical expenses. But the families of the elderly feel that this is not only what they should do, but also what they have done is far from enough. The family of the old man believes that it is natural that the construction company should be responsible for the accidents that happened on the construction site.

As for the old man stealing, it is also untenable, because since the wall has been torn down in half and nobody cares about it for a long time, it means that this is something nobody wants. The old man dug up the steel bars inside, which was at best garbage collection, not theft.

Besides, your wall is torn down in half, and there must be risks. Why not put up a warning sign around "Don't take it"? As a result, my grandfather's family went to the door many times to ask for a statement. They gave the construction company two choices: either bear the hospitalization expenses of grandpa and restore all medical expenses; Or pay them 2 million in one lump sum.

This makes the construction company that has paid tens of thousands of medical bills feel unreasonable: I didn't care if you stole from my house, and I paid tens of thousands of medical bills for you. Now you want to put all the responsibility on us, which is simply unreasonable. For this matter, the relevant units failed to resolve it through mediation many times, and the family members insisted that it was the responsibility of the construction company.

After reading this matter, do you think the construction company is responsible and should pay compensation? I mean, this family is so unreasonable. Personally, I feel that this family is purely for the large medical expenses in the later period. They don't want to pay the money themselves, or they can't afford it, so they have to shift the responsibility to a third party, so that the other party doesn't have to pay for it themselves.

In order not to spend money, in their view, reason, reason and morality are not important. The important thing is that you don't spend money. To this end, they insisted that the construction company lose money. Otherwise, no normal person will take such an absurd statement as a reason to shirk responsibility.

Now how to deal with the law, the family members of the elderly insist that they should bear the liability for compensation, because the workplace did not set up warning signs at the incident site. Personally, I think this statement should not be supported for the following reasons:

First, as a person with full capacity for civil conduct, it is illegal for the elderly to choose to "steal steel bars". When deducting steel bars from abandoned buildings, they should foresee potential safety hazards and be responsible for their own actions.

Second, if the construction site has set up warning signs at the door and other places, then they should not be severely criticized for setting up warning signs everywhere. It is common sense that there is danger in the construction site, and it is even more unpredictable for the old man to sneak into the construction site and smash the wall and buckle the steel bar.

Third, the elderly do not belong to the construction workers on the site, and the management should not be responsible for their safety. As long as the safety measures at the construction site are in place, they should not be responsible for it.

Fourth, if thieves still need a sense of security, that is the real slippery world. We can't encourage "I am weak and I am right", and nothing without fault should be compensated, even humanitarian compensation.

Generally speaking, I personally think that the elderly were injured by stealing steel bars, and their families took the opportunity to extort 2 million yuan, which should also be condemned. It is suggested that the construction site should not compromise and take legal procedures.