On how to do a good job of party building in courts

Third, the train of thought of strengthening the party building work in grass-roots courts (1) establish and improve the party's cadre team building mechanism. First of all, grass-roots courts should actively coordinate with local organizations to ensure the party affairs preparation of grass-roots courts; In order to improve the enthusiasm and initiative of cadres in party member, it is necessary to establish a post allowance system for party workers. Secondly, set up a full-time deputy secretary of the Party Committee (Party General Branch) or a full-time party cadre to be specifically responsible for the party building work of the court, so that the party building work of the court has special personnel. Finally, establish a responsibility mechanism for party building work, sign it at different levels, implement it at different levels, implement a "dual-track" operation system of party building responsibility system and trial performance responsibility system, conduct separate assessment, and comprehensively reward and punish to ensure that the party building work is managed and arrested. (2) Establish a retention mechanism. The main reasons why judges can't become attractive and competitive positions for outstanding legal talents are low salary, heavy task of handling cases and great mental pressure. Therefore, to strengthen the party building work in grass-roots courts, it is necessary to establish a mechanism of retaining people and achieve "four concerns": caring for the health of police officers and establishing health files; Care about the treatment of the police and let the police get the treatment they deserve; Concerned about the life of police officers and actively trying to solve the difficulties in the life of police officers; Care about the progress of police officers, give timely rewards to the achievements made by police officers in their work, and give timely care and help to the difficulties and setbacks encountered by police officers in their work. (three) the establishment of party member performance appraisal management system. As a judicial organ, the court's performance appraisal cannot be based on the traditional economic quantitative indicators. In addition, due to the different functions and work nature of each department, this reality determines that the performance evaluation of the court is quite difficult. Therefore, the court should formulate a scientific and reasonable evaluation index system according to the professional nature of the current judicial function and the principles of comprehensiveness, pertinence, operability and adaptability. This answer was recommended by Lv Huan, an expert in social and livelihood classification.