Why are farmers not excited when rural houses are unified and one family moves to the community?

Moving to the community means that their home has less free space and no yard. Unlike cities, there are many farm tools in the countryside, such as some farm machinery at home. So farmers have no strong desire for semi-communities.

1. moving to a residential area is basically like this. It's almost the same as the house that was demolished and rebuilt. There is no elevator, and the community environment is not so good. There is never an elevator on the fifth floor, which is not a big obstacle for young people. But for the elderly, there is an elevator on the fifth floor, which means that they may not be able to go downstairs for a year except for necessary activities. Because the old people can't walk, it is said that the old people in the countryside don't want to move into the building.

2. As for the decoration of the house, if it is a 2-bedroom, 1 hall, then it is a huge burden to say how to live with two children at home, plus the heating, water, electricity and natural gas of the property, because for rural people, there was no need to pay any fees for heating except electricity, and they could get some firewood to achieve the effect of heating, or burn their own coal, so there was not so much property fee.

3. Reasons for the implementation of the policy, the policy may be good, but not all farmers can get benefits in the process of real implementation. Some communities move without any compensation. But to move to a residential area, farmers need to pay their own money, because developers say that the rural building area is 1:0.8, which means that their rural houses are 1 0,000 square meters, and they only give the city 80 square meters, and they want a bigger one.

Generally speaking, moving from a bungalow to a building leads to higher living costs and smaller activity space, and then a large family can't settle down, and it may not be comfortable in the building, so people are reluctant to move.