What's the difference between V version and G version of Zero UAV?

phantom 4 is recommended, with good materials and quality and high image transmission stability.

I personally summarize several shortcomings of the zero V version:

1. The picture transmission signal is not good, the card starts at 3 meters, and the definition is not high. The bracket only supports mobile phones, and the screen is small and tired. The 3(Phantom 3)Advanced supports tablets up to 17MM in size.

2. Due to insufficient materials, we can feel the cost control. The whole fuselage, remote control, battery, etc. are not resistant to falling (it can be broken at a height of 2 meters).

3. After the first landing, it was hard to start the motor, and it was often exhausted (the motor could not be started one hour after landing). It was said that it was vibration protection, but it was actually a quality problem of the flight control or remote control, because the landing was always very stable. After many attempts, the motor could only be started by pushing the outer figure forward a little after the outer figure eight, but the simple outer figure eight could not start the motor at all. I flew for 2 times before I found out this solution. Before, it was all stupid and others.

4. The zero-degree camera is seriously distorted, which requires software processing. Phantom 3 Advanced is basically undistorted.

5. The height limit of zero degree is 12 meters, which is quite different from the 5 meters advanced by Phantom 3.