On how to do a good job in judicial assistance.

First, the necessity of establishing a grassroots judicial assistance network.

1, the real dilemma of more people and fewer cases still exists and is on the rise.

In recent years, Cixi and Fenghua have experienced rapid economic development, complicated social interests, increasing diversification of stakeholders and frequent social disputes. At the same time, with the advancement of the process of governing the country according to law and the deepening of legal publicity, the people's awareness of rights protection has been significantly enhanced, and the concept of litigation has also undergone tremendous changes. The traditional litigation concept and litigation-weariness habit of "harmony is the most important" have gradually faded, and more people tend to go to court for litigation, resulting in a large number of disputes entering the court through litigation. In the past three years, the number of cases accepted by the courts in Cixi and Fenghua has remained high and increased year by year. Restricted by the establishment and other factors, the court's trial execution power has not increased significantly. At the same time, due to the retirement of judges and the transfer of personnel, the court's trial execution power is relatively weakened, which makes the court face a large number of practical contradictions in cases and bear heavy work pressure. In this regard, the court has strengthened internal management, diverted complex cases, and improved judicial efficiency. Judges have also adopted overtime methods such as "white plus black" and "five plus two", but the contradiction between more people and fewer cases is still outstanding. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to establish a judicial assistance network, make full use of various social resources and resolve contradictions with the help of external forces.

2. The effective participation of the people and social forces in the judicial process is insufficient.

The history of people's courts is a history of continuous reform and development. Driven by the judicial reform, although the quality of the court team has been significantly improved, the awareness of judicial standardization, specialization and stylization has been significantly enhanced, and the judicial efficiency has been greatly improved, the participation of grassroots governments and mass autonomous organizations in the judicial reform process is still relatively weak. In addition, with the continuous improvement of mass autonomy in rural communities, village cadres are generally elected by the masses through democratic elections. Some cadres are unwilling to cooperate with judicial work for fear of offending others. To some extent, this has led to the increasingly prominent problems in judicial practice, such as difficulty in service, investigation, mediation and execution. It has become a useful way for the people's courts to improve their work by establishing a grassroots judicial assistance network, obtaining the support of grassroots governments, village cadres, industry associations, social organizations and other social forces for judicial work, and allowing the people to actively and effectively participate in the judicial work of the courts.

3. The public's recognition of judicial reform needs to be improved.

The achievements of judicial reform have not been fully recognized by society. For example, while pursuing substantive justice, the people's courts attach great importance to procedural justice and the stylization and standardization of judicial procedures, and the trial process of cases is carried out in the courts. The stylization and standardization of judicial procedure not only realizes procedural justice and guarantees judicial justice, but also makes some people feel the affinity of justice. For the people's courts, it is necessary to further intensify judicial reform, strengthen internal supervision and improve the reasoning of judgment documents. At the same time, by establishing a grassroots judicial assistance network, we can improve the judicial environment with the help of social forces, show judicial affinity, and let the people really feel the fruits of judicial reform, which has also become one of the driving forces for us to establish a grassroots judicial assistance network.