Joke Collection Website - Bulletin headlines - High school politics short answer question skills

High school politics short answer question skills

1. Problem-solving routines and techniques

(1) Approval and setting questions

Setting and approval of questions is the most critical step in answering subjective questions. Otherwise, you will write a thousand words and miss the topic thousands of miles. To approve the question, three elements must be approved:

1. Knowledge limitation. That is, the scope of textbook knowledge specified by the test questions. As far as the textbook knowledge required by the exam description is concerned, it includes four parts: economic life, political life, cultural life, life and philosophy, and each part has specific divisions. Therefore, students must lay a good foundation and handle the relationship between macro system and micro knowledge.

2. Question type. Looking at the college entrance examination questions across the country over the years, the political subjective questions can be summarized into five question types, and each type of question has its basic answer pattern. A brief description is as follows:

(1) Reflection phenomenon type (mostly seen in chart-form test questions): reflected phenomenon = time + chart theme + reflected event.

(2) Reflection category: point of view + material + tail (this reflects this).

(3) Cause (significance) category: viewpoint + analysis of reasons (generally can be analyzed from the aspects of current situation, harm or effect, and significance).

(4) Measures: opinions + specific solutions.

(5) Cognition (analysis) category: Generally, it can be analyzed from three perspectives: what is it, why, and how to do it.

3. Background limitation. It includes two situations: one is object limitation. For example: Reflection type questions, which limit where to find the truth of expression; Reason (meaning) type questions, which limit the reason (meaning) of what to answer; Measure type questions, which limit the answers to the measures to solve the problem; Cognition (discrimination) type questions The test questions limit what to understand (discriminate). The other is subject limitation, that is, some questions are clearly limited to answers from the perspective of a certain subject (such as the country, enterprises, consumers, the party, citizens, etc.). If these two qualifications are not approved, the answer may be futile.

(2) Reviewing the materials

The political subjective questions of the college entrance examination are always based on situational materials, and in recent years, the number of situational materials of the political subjective questions of the college entrance examination has increased year by year. increase. Therefore, whether you can review the materials clearly and extract effective information from the materials has become an important part of whether you can sort out the key points of answering the questions and answer the subjective questions well. To do this step well, we should start from three aspects:

1. Summarize the center and clarify the theme. Try to use the shortest sentences to summarize the center of the material and clarify the theme around which the material revolves.

2. Divide into levels and find connections. Divide materials into layers, summarize the meaning of layers, and clarify the relationship between layers.

3. Grasp the key points and understand the key points. Dig out the key phrases in the materials, make inferences based on the textbook knowledge limited in the questions, and sort out the key points for answering the questions.

(3) Organizing Answers

The organized answers are the result of students’ comprehensive analysis and are also the only basis for determining the student’s score on the test paper. Therefore, you must pay attention to the following aspects and answer the questions in a standardized manner.

1. Organize the answers according to the basic pattern of the test questions to achieve an organic combination of opinions and analysis;

2. The opinions must be expressed accurately, the analysis must be comprehensive, and the logic must be reasonable. , rigorous thinking and clear hierarchy;

3. The answers should be in key points, serialized, and paragraphed;

4. The writing should be neat and the words should be concise.