Are the epidemic prevention and control regulations in Chengde, Hebei Province reasonable during the epidemic?

Reasonable.

The current epidemic prevention and control situation in the region is complex and severe. In order to further control the epidemic transmission channels and reduce the risk of transmission, the Epidemic Prevention and Control Office of Hebei Chengde High-tech Zone actually issued such a statement, one of which read: : For those involved in the epidemic who deliberately conceal their itinerary and refuse to cooperate with the transfer, collateral relatives within the third generation are not allowed to join the army, join the party, or apply for civil servants and public institutions, etc. Is this epidemic prevention policy too strict?

In the face of the epidemic, there is nothing wrong with strict prevention and control. However, in the context of the normalization of the epidemic, Chengde's introduction of such "hard-core" epidemic prevention measures is obviously challenging the bottom line of the rule of law, stirring up public nerves, and creating social anxiety. .

No response has come, and the announcement has been withdrawn. As we all know, political review is very strict for civil service examinations for civil servants, public institutions, and the military:

As civil servants, they invest more in national construction or grassroots construction, so character is particularly important. On the one hand, no matter what age group or gender. As a civil servant, you must have a moral bottom line and social standards. The political review of national civil servants mainly emphasizes that candidates have progressive thoughts, good moral character, decent style, and strong organizational discipline and legal concepts. This kind of political review is also to better serve the country and the people.

Although military civilian personnel are not active military personnel and do not wear military uniforms without military membership, they still perform the corresponding duties of similar positions as active-duty officers (civilian cadres). They have special work and heavy responsibilities, and their political literacy must be the same as that of active-duty personnel. Only by being equally strong can we ensure that this team can have firm beliefs, obey the party's command, and dedicate themselves to the practice of strengthening the army under any circumstances.

The political review of public institutions is essentially similar to that of civil servants. In comparison, it may be a little looser. Some employers will check the files even if the political review is over, and some units will follow the rules of civil servants. Following a set of procedures is not just a formality.

Therefore, there is no unified national standard for political review. Each unit measures it on its own. Some units are strict and some are relatively loose. Therefore, for the same problem, the results of political review in different units may be different.

If collateral relatives within the third generation are involved in the epidemic and do not cooperate with the epidemic investigation, wouldn’t the candidates’ work be in vain? The editor would like to remind my friends that the political review is very strict. Regardless of whether this clause is added or not, if you apply for these units, you should also restrain yourself. After all, as a public figure, you must always be strict with yourself. Don't leave any stain on yourself with your words and deeds. It is impossible to relax political review. It would be naive to wait for policy adjustments to exploit loopholes.