Report on verification of rural subsistence allowance and extreme poverty support work in the county

Report on the verification of rural subsistence allowances and extreme poverty support in the county

In order to conscientiously implement the rural subsistence allowance and extreme poverty support and assistance policies, and effectively solve the problems faced by the masses in the rural subsistence allowance and extreme poverty support and assistance work In response to strong hotspots and difficult issues, the County Civil Affairs Bureau dispatched five working groups. Starting from March 1, they will use a week to review archives, conduct household visits and surveys, etc. The implementation of policies and the distribution of disaster relief funds were comprehensively verified. During this inspection, 58 administrative villages were randomly inspected, and 649 households receiving subsistence allowances and 182 households receiving special poverty support were visited. On March 7, the Municipal Rescue Bureau conducted unannounced visits to ** Village in ** Town and ** Village in ** Town. Judging from the verification results and the feedback results from the city's unannounced investigation team, the county's rural subsistence allowance and special poverty support and assistance policies are well implemented, the guarantee targets are determined more accurately, and the disaster relief funds are released in a timely manner, but there are still some outstanding problems:

First, the main responsibilities of the township people’s governments are not fulfilled enough.

During the verification, by reviewing the township and village subsistence allowance files and related materials, it was found that the township government’s main responsibility in the “acceptance, investigation, evaluation, review, and publicity” link of the subsistence allowance was not fully implemented. Some towns and villages still rely on village cadres for rural subsistence allowance work. Township leaders and village cadres are not responsible for conducting household surveys in detail. The basic information of the people in need is unclear, their family situations are unknown, and the review and control are not strict. Some even do not conduct household surveys. Just sign the summary form;

Some towns and villages have unclear responsibilities and pass the buck. The masses go to the village, and the village says to go to the township. If they find the township, the township says to go to the village cadres, and then go to the village cadres. He also said that he was looking for Murakami and kicked the ball. As a result, people in need had no way to seek help and more petitions were made to the county and city.

Second, policy publicity is not in place.

Most township social assistance policy publicity methods are lagging behind and the content is not detailed. Township government affairs halls and administrative village departments have not posted rural subsistence allowance policies and application approval flow charts. The public’s awareness of rural subsistence allowance policies is low. , Some village cadres are even unclear about the policies and procedures for subsistence allowances and special poverty support assistance, and some subsistence allowance recipients are not clear about the categories of subsistence allowances they enjoy.

Third, the subsistence allowance file information is incomplete and the operation is not timely.

Except for the four towns of **, **, **, and **, other towns generally have problems such as incomplete personal files on minimum living allowances, untimely operation of various records, and chaotic data management. In 2017 New personal files for minimum living allowances have basically not been created. Village-level data are generally poor, with serious deficiencies. Data in recent years have not been filed and processed annually and are mixed together; The flower names do not indicate the reason for the increase or decrease. The recorded data of some villages are only available until the first quarter of 2016.

Fourthly, problems such as "dismantling household insurance, combining household insurance, and secondary allocation of minimum living security funds" still exist.

During the verification, it was found that all towns and villages have problems with household splitting and joint household insurance to varying degrees. Towns, towns and villages still follow the old practice of allocating subsistence allowance quotas to natural villages. In order to make up the numbers, village groups As for household splitting and joint household splitting, some people separate the household registrations of the elderly and frail elderly people and enjoy subsistence allowances, forming the split household living security. A random inspection by the Municipal Rescue Bureau's undercover investigation team found that 4 people in ** Village ** in ** Town received the second-category subsistence allowance in 2016. He himself only received 80 yuan per month. The remaining funds were distributed by the village chief to the elderly over 70 years old in the village. Each person received 80 yuan per month, ** receives the second category of subsistence allowance for two people, and the subsistence allowance is divided equally between **, **, and **, creating a problem of secondary distribution of subsistence allowance.

Fifth, there are "four problems", such as the problem of people who die or get married receiving minimum living allowances in violation of regulations.

The **Group** of **Town** Village purchased a Brilliance car (Gan l-k07417) in August 2016 and enjoyed Category II subsistence allowance for 2 people.

The family in ** Village ** has a shop (registered with the Industrial and Commercial Bureau) and enjoys the three-category subsistence allowance for 4 people; Class I subsistence allowance;

**Wife ** of ** Town ** Village ** Group ** passed away, and the household registration was canceled in May 2015, but still enjoys Class I subsistence allowance;

** The household registration of ** group ** in ** village ** is 6 people, and 7 people enjoy three types of subsistence allowances;

The daughter of ** group ** in ** village got married in June 2016, and still enjoys three Class subsistence allowance.

Sixth, the targets of individual special poverty relief are inaccurate.

**Township** Village** Group** has two sons, both are unmarried, capable of working, and **enjoy special poverty relief support;

**Township** The ** couple in the village ** group have been enjoying special poverty relief since 2013. In the second half of 2016, they also enjoyed the second-category subsistence allowance, and received the subsistence allowance repeatedly for 6 months.

Seventh, the amount of erroneous information in the subsistence allowance information system is relatively large.

During this verification, it was found that in all towns and villages, the payment of subsistence allowances failed due to inaccurate information entered into the subsistence allowance system, which affected the timely disbursement of funds and required the entry information to be changed again.

In view of the above existing problems, the following rectification suggestions are put forward:

First, in conjunction with the county-wide rural subsistence allowance "look back" special rectification activities, all subsistence allowances, We will conduct a comprehensive inspection of the special poverty relief recipients, and resolutely correct problems such as "relationship protection, household splitting insurance, joint household insurance, and secondary allocation of guarantee funds". For those who are found to be incompatible with the security conditions such as "four things", death, marriage, etc. during the verification, they will be reported to the County Civil Affairs Bureau with official documents before the end of March, and the subsistence allowance will be suspended from the second quarter. At the same time, those who have received it in violation of regulations will be The subsistence allowance must be resolutely recovered and turned over to the county's special financial account.

Second, we must speed up the improvement of rural archives. Before the end of March, all townships and towns must complete all files and materials for rural subsistence allowances in 2017, including "personal files of subsistence allowance households", county and township "household verification forms", ""3 1" comprehensive evaluation form", "democratic evaluators" Information Form", "Registration Form for the Subsistence Allowance for Close Relatives of Village Committee Cadres" and "Meeting Records", "Evaluation Records", "Publicity Records", "Petition Records", etc., and at the same time, all types of archives before 2017 must be reviewed Organize and archive files.

Third, we must increase the intensity of policy publicity, refine the content of publicity, innovate publicity methods, and enhance the awareness of the policy among the masses, especially rural cadres.