A woman saved money and the bank gave her an extra 10,000 yuan. How did the court decide? What do you think of this verdict?

A bank gave a woman an extra 10,000 yuan when she was depositing money. In the end, the court will rule that the customer will be required to return the 10,000 yuan.

Recently, everyone learned that when a woman went to the bank counter to deposit money, the teller pressed an extra 0 due to a mistake, and she got a windfall. This is a problem that occurred in a bank in a certain city in Jiangsu. This problem occurred due to a teller's mistake. Then Nihao would ask the customer to return the 10,000 yuan because this matter was the teller's business. Therefore, the customer was unwilling to return the 10,000 yuan, and the money was directly rejected. In desperation, the staff and the bank directly took the customer to court. Through the understanding of relevant information, the client is called Ms. Zhou, and she is also familiar with some deposit services handled by the bank.

Mainly because there was change in the deposit business I handled, I found the counter staff to help me handle it manually. When using the money counter, the teller directly counted the 15,700 yuan in cash, and then entered it. At that time, the system accidentally changed Jiang Yishu's number to 2, so the actual amount deposited in Ms. Min's account was 25,570 yuan. An abnormality occurred when the staff was reconciling the account that day. After verifying each item, they finally targeted a woman directly. When the staff contacted the woman, she wanted to ask for a deposit. A lady insisted that the money she saved was only 25,000 yuan, and she was unwilling to cooperate with the bank in handling related business.

Several times of communication were of no use. The bank also sued the bank directly to the People's Court and asked the lady to repay the loan. The court also believed that the teller accidentally transferred 10,000 yuan to the bank. The most critical point in this case of mistakenly depositing 2.5 yuan is that the plaintiff needs to prove that the defendant actually deposited 15,000 yuan. It can be found in the surveillance video that it is 15,000 yuan. This is also where the evidence lies.