Fairness and justice are like a lamp, shining on the journey of human history. Without the pursuit of fairness and justice, mankind will lose the motivation for the development of civilization...

Slogan: 1. Without fairness and justice, the world will always be dark. 2. Fairness and justice are the weights on the scale.

Topic: Is development or fairness more important?

Activity plan

1. Purpose of the activity

In order to better enrich the students’ extracurricular cultural life, improve their expression and thinking skills, and promote students’ Interaction between students, cultivating the spirit of teamwork, and building a platform for students to express themselves.

2. Schedule

The competition adopts a single-elimination system, with 4 preliminary rounds, 2 semi-finals and 1 finals.

1. Time schedule:

Preliminary round: May 8th, May 15th

Semi-finals: May 24th

Final: May 26

2. Location: School Gymnasium

3. Participating Teams

1. Each class will form a representative team Participate.

2. Each participating team consists of a team leader, four debate team members, and five members. The four debate team members are required to speak clearly, think quickly, and dress uniformly. It is recommended that they be composed of members of the opposite sex.

3. Based on the principles of fairness, conciseness and effectiveness, the representative team will draw lots in rounds to determine the opponents, debate topics and positions.

4. During the competition period, the team leader is responsible for all administrative work of the participating team.

5. Debate (pro) Human beings need fairness and justice, (con) human beings do not need fairness and justice.

IV. Judging Organization

1. Eight teachers will be invited to form a judging panel for each competition.

2. The eight judges will score the participating teams according to the group scoring items. The highest score will be deducted, the lowest score will be deducted, and the average of the remaining 6 scores will be the team's score. The two teams with the highest score win and can advance to the next round.

3. The eight judges will score individual debaters according to the scoring standards. The debaters’ scores will be used as the basis for selecting outstanding debaters and the best debaters.

4. Each game will invite a special guest commentator who will give an analysis speech after the game but will not participate in the scoring. Two notaries will be invited to supervise and notarize the openness, fairness and impartiality of the game on site.

5. Please see Appendix 2 for the scoring standards and details.

6. Please see Appendix 1 for the debate procedures and details.

5. Award Settings

1. Group Awards

This competition has one first prize, two second prizes, two third prizes, outstanding Four prizes.

2. Individual Awards

This competition will select 8 outstanding debaters and 1 best debater.

3. Prize Awarding

The winning team will be awarded a certificate, and the players of the team will be given certain material rewards; the winning individuals will be awarded certificates of honor and certain material rewards will be given.

6. Staffing

1. One chairman. Announce the start of the debate competition, introduce the debate topic, participating teams and their positions, introduce the participating team members, judging panel, and guest commentators, maintain the atmosphere of the competition, and announce the results of the competition.

2. Two timekeepers. Each team will be timed separately according to the debate rules. When each team has 30 seconds left to speak, the timekeeper will raise a sign to signal; when each team is up, the whistle will be blown to stop speaking.

3. Four scorers. After the judging panel has finished scoring, the scorer is responsible for summarizing and delivering the final score to the debate chairman.

7. Equipment and equipment

2 stopwatches, 2 whistles, 2 yellow cards, and 18 seat signs.

8. Notes

1. If you have any questions before the competition, you can go to the organizing committee for consultation and answers.

2. During the competition, the language should be sharp but principled, and the spirit should be full but polite.

3. If any uncivilized behavior occurs during the competition, the team or member will be disqualified from judging.

Attachment 1:

Debate procedures and rules

1. Debate procedures

The debate competition is divided into arguments, attack and defense, free debate and The concluding speech is carried out in four procedures. The specific procedures are as follows:

Procedure

Time

One

Confidant

< p>Know the enemy

The affirmative side speaks in the first argument

3 minutes

The negative side speaks in the first argument

3 minutes

Second

Defense

Counterattack

1. The second defense of the negative side and the third defense of the affirmative are conducted one-on-one; the second defense of the negative side asks questions first

2 minutes

(1 minute for each side)

2. The second defense of the affirmative and the third defense of the negative will be conducted one-on-one; the second defense of the affirmative will ask questions first

2 minutes

(1 minute for each side)

3. Summary of the first defense of the affirmative

1 minute

4. Summary of the first defense of the negative side

1 minute

Three

Close combat

Both sides take turns to speak, and the affirmative side starts first

p>

10 minutes (5 minutes for each side)

4. The final word

Concluding speeches of the four opposing sides

4 minutes

< p>Summary speech of the affirmative's four arguments

4 minutes

Total 30 minutes 2. Debate details

1. Know yourself and know the enemy stage: The opening of the argument does not need to be at the theoretical level Too much entanglement. The argument must be logically clear and concise.

2. Defensive counterattack stage:

It consists of the second defense of the negative side, the third defense of the positive side, and the second defense of the positive side and the third defense of the negative side for one-on-one attack and defense. The pros and cons will make a summary of the defense.

Each speech should be concise and clear, and the total time of each party should not exceed 1 minute. The attacking and defending parties must complete this round of attacking and defending independently, and are not allowed to change midway.

In each round of attack and defense, the roles of attack and defense are not allowed to be interchanged, the defense is not allowed to ask questions, and the attack side is not allowed to answer questions.

The attacker’s questions should be close to the topic of the debate and should not be difficult. The defense should be specific when answering and avoid answering questions that are not asked. Points will be deducted for repeated questions and evasive questions.

The pros and cons players stand and complete each round of defense. The defense players sitting down within the specified time are deemed to have completed the round of defense.

After the two rounds of attack and defense, the team will make a summary of the attack and defense for the team, first with the affirmative and then with the negative. The attack and defense summaries of both sides should be based on the situation and content involved in the attack and defense stage. 2-5 points will be deducted accordingly for drafts that are out of touch with the actual situation of the competition.

3. Close combat stage:

Free debate speeches must be alternated between the two teams, with the affirmative speaking first.

The time spent by each team is calculated cumulatively. When the speaking debater takes his seat, the end of his speech is the timing mark for the beginning of the other side's speech. The other side's debater must speak immediately. If there is a gap, the accumulated time will continue as usual.

There is no limit on the order, frequency, and time of speeches by debaters from the same side. If one party's time has run out, the other party can continue to speak or signal to the chairperson to give up.

Active confrontation is encouraged, and 2-5 points will be deducted for those who avoid confrontation more than twice on important issues. If the other party still lingers on questions that have been clearly answered, 5-10 points will be deducted appropriately.

The free debate competition requires concise and clear strengthening of one's own point of view, witty and powerful refutation of the other party's arguments, and it cannot be a hollow attack, intentionally avoiding the other party's questions or causing confusion in opinions and language.

Debaters are encouraged to speak calmly and naturally, and do not advocate aggressive, imposing, reciting or performing language styles.

Advocate a good debating style, focus on popularizing knowledge, enlightening wisdom and showing grace, avoid personal attacks, try to avoid politicians and political events, and try to avoid current sensitive international issues and ethnic and religious issues.

4. Final word stage

Both sides of the debate should summarize the overall situation of the debate and pay attention to sublimating the connotation of the debate topic; be divorced from reality, recite the manuscript prepared in advance, and appropriately deduct 2 —5 points.

Appendix 2:

Scoring criteria and details

1. Scoring criteria

1. Group score: ***150 points, Two parts are scored.

Debate stage: 100 points. Know yourself and the enemy: 20 points. Defensive counterattack: 30 points.

Close encounter: 30 points. Final decision: 20 points.

Comprehensive impression: 50 points. Score

Language and demeanor: 20 points Group cooperation, on-the-spot reaction: 25 points Dressing and appearance: 5 points

2. Individual debater scores: 50 points in total for each game

< p>Language expression: 10 points Argument ability: 10 points Demeanor: 10 points

Team awareness: 10 points Comprehensive impression: 10 points

II. Scoring rules

< p>1. Group part

★Question review: Whether the position held can be analyzed and understood from multiple levels and angles such as logic, theory, and facts, whether the arguments are sufficient, whether the reasoning is clear, and whether the difficulties of the party are There is effective processing.

★Argument: Whether the argument is persuasive, whether the arguments are sufficient, whether the reasoning process is logical, and whether the fact citations are appropriate.

★Argument: Can the question capture the other party’s key points, and is the question simple and clear? If a question is not asked within the stipulated time or the question is unclear, points shall be deducted appropriately. Whether you answer the other party's questions head-on and give people a sound and well-founded feeling. Points will be deducted accordingly for not answering or answering directly.

★Cooperation: Whether there is team spirit, whether there is mutual support, whether the debate connection is smooth, whether the free debate speech is well-organized, whether the answers form an organic whole, and whether the opponent is given a powerful blow.

★Language: Whether it is fluent, the wording is appropriate, the tone is cadence, the speaking speed is moderate, whether the other debater respects the other debater and the judges, whether the performance is appropriate, elegant, and has a sense of humor.

Note: The one with the higher score among the two teams in each game is the winner and can enter the next round.

2. Personal part

★Discussion: The judges will give impression points based on each debater’s performance in normal competitions: whether the speech is fluent

, whether the reasoning is thorough, whether the logic is strong, and whether the examples quoted are appropriate.

★Debate: whether the question is appropriate, whether the answer is pertinent, whether the rebuttal is strong and reasonable, whether the response is alert, and whether the wording is appropriate.

★Typhoon and Bianfeng.

Note: The two debaters with the highest votes in each competition will be the outstanding debaters. The person with the highest number of votes in the finals will be the best debater in this competition. The individual performance of the debaters is only used as the basis for judging individual awards and has nothing to do with judging the outcome of each game.

School Youth League Committee

March 3, 2007