I read Lu Xun's essays such as Gai Hua Collection, Hot Wind and North-South Assembly Number, which are about 800 words long. thank you

Dreaming is free, but talking about dreaming is not free. Dreams are real dreams, and it is inevitable to lie when you say dreams.

On the first day of New Year's Day, I got an extra-large edition of Oriental Magazine with a "New Year's Dream" at the end. [2] I asked "China in my dream" and "personal life", 140 people answered. I understand the reporter's painstaking efforts. I must think that speech is not free. It is better to talk about dreams and the truth in dreams than the so-called truth. I turned it over happily and knew that the reporter had failed greatly.

Before I got this oversized book, I met a contributor. He saw the printed version in front of me and claimed that his answer had been deleted by the capitalist, but the dream he said was not like this. This shows that although capitalists can't stop people from dreaming, they have already said that if they want to interfere with power, they will never give you freedom. This has been a major failure of journalists.

But we don't care about this dream change case, just look at the dream written. As the reporter said, almost all the answers are intellectuals. First of all, no one feels that life is unstable. Secondly, many people dream of a good society in the future, such as "from each according to his ability" and "one world", which is quite eccentric (I added the last three sentences, but the reporter didn't say it).

But then he became a little "crazy". He picked up a theory from there, and divided more than 100 dreams into two categories, saying that dreams of a good society are dreams of "relying on Taoism" and "heresy", and authentic dreams should be "expressing aspirations", making "aspirations" an empty thing. [3] But Confucius said that "everyone has his own ambition", and finally agreed with Ceng Dian, [4] because his ambition is in line with Confucius' "Tao".

In fact, it is a reporter's dream of "carrying the road", which is very rare. The article is written awake, and the question is close to a "psychological test". Respondents should dream a dream that suits their occupation, status and identity (the deleted person is naturally not in this case). Even if it looks like how to "carry the road", it has no "propaganda" significance for a good society in the future. Therefore, although some people dream of "everyone has food", some dream of "classless society" and some dream of "one world", few people dream of class struggle, white terror, bombing, cruelty, pepper spray, electrocution before the establishment of such a society ... Without these dreams, a good society will not come, and it will be a dream after all.

However, some people want to realize this "dream". They are not talking, but doing, dreaming of the future and working hard to realize the present of this future. Because of this fact, many intellectuals can't help but talk about the dream of "carrying Tao", but in fact it is not "carrying Tao" but "carrying Tao". If you want to be concise, it should be said that it is "carrying the road."

Why "pretend"? Yue: It's for the problem of eating now and in the future.

We are still bound by old ideas. When it comes to eating, we feel almost vulgar. But I don't mean to belittle the respondents. The reporter of Oriental Magazine once quoted Buddha Leuther [5] in Reflection on Reading, arguing that "real" dreams are "expressing everyone's inner secrets, but have no social function". However, the root of Buddha Luther's dream is repression-why are people suppressed? This is related to social systems and habits. It's okay to dream, but it's not appropriate to say, ask and analyze. The reporter didn't think of this layer, so he ran into the capitalist's brush. However, I think everyone must be dissatisfied with the introduction of "depression theory" to interpret dreams.

However, I'm afraid that the Buddha Leute has a few pennies, and when he is full, he doesn't feel bad, only paying attention to sexual desire. There are many people in the same situation as him, so clap your hands for joy. It is true that he also told us that daughters love their fathers more and sons love their mothers more because of the opposite sex. However, not long after the baby is born, both men and women will raise their lips and turn their heads. Does it want to kiss the opposite sex? No, everyone knows: eat!

The root of appetite is really deeper than sexual desire. When we don't feel sick when we open our mouths to love and close our mouths to love letters, we don't have to eat. Because it is a waking dream, it is not true, because the topic is "dream" after all, and as the reporter said, we are "material needs far exceed the pursuit of spirit", so when the censor's guardianship [6] (also quoting the Buddha's Leuther language) seems to be removed, some of it is made public. In fact, it is also "posting slogans in dreams", but it is not active, and some may be the opposite of the superficial "slogan".

The times have changed so much, and the rice bowl is so difficult. Think about the present and the future, some people can only dream like this. They are all petty bourgeoisie (although some people call me "feudal remnants" or "indigenous bourgeoisie", I will call myself a member of this class for the time being), and they can take care of each other, but there is no need to keep secrets.

As for other celebrities, their dreams are firewood for hermits and fishermen, which is completely different from their true nature [7]. In fact, they just feel the fragility of their work and just want to expand the scope of eating, from the imperial court to the garden, from the foreign market to the mountains, far greater than the above, so I won't say much here.