Does anyone use Tourex travel system or Stuart CMS travel system, which is better ~

Answer your first question first. Is Stuart CMS easy to use? A product is produced because of market demand. In the initial stage of product design, enterprises should make a crowd portrait of such users, such as age stage, educational background, operation and use of software, and make a detailed analysis and research. After the product goes online, the market will feed back the shortcomings of the product. In this process, the enterprise will constantly upgrade the system iteratively, and slowly meet the expectations of users, even exceeding expectations. This is the fundamental reason why a product can survive for ten years and get better and better. Let's take a look at the customer's feedback on the original position.

Now to answer your second question, how does Situ compare with other systems?

As far as the development language of the system is concerned, PHP is a web embedded development language with strong portability and flexible secondary development. Compared with other systems, the overall level of the language is light and the running speed is fast, which is self-evident.

From the mode of system support, it supports B2B, B2C, B2B2C and various marketing applications from online to offline. Compared with other systems, this advantage begins to appear.

In terms of business scope supported by the system, it supports businesses in scenic spots, outdoor activities, private line operators, land agencies, travel agencies and other fields.

From the technical support of the system, the system is open source and supports secondary development.

In terms of system flexibility, both the application and the template exist as an entity, and the template and the application can be changed with one click.

Through the above analysis, I think its advantages are obvious. ?

Let's see what other people say about the way of thinking (I collected it online):