What is the most obvious shortcoming of Nokia 808?

The most obvious shortcoming is that the photo is so good that it can capture people’s pores very clearly

Just kidding

The screen resolution is not high (In fact, it’s enough). The software is not as rich as Android and Apple (but there are commonly used software, but there are fewer games). The camera is a bit too prominent. Some people think it is ugly, but some people think it is domineering.

The Internet experience of Symbian system is generally not very good (but who has nothing to do with using their mobile phone to access the computer version of the website all day long? Even if it is a high-resolution mobile phone, you still need to zoom back and forth to view it. Even if it is a 1080p mobile phone, you can Can you distinguish the words on the web page? ) There are relatively few Symbian video clients (I know of a popular one), and the experience is not good. If you want to watch online videos, go with Apple or Android. The sound quality of the 808 is not bad, not very good (I haven’t heard that the sound quality of the 808 is very good. The Dolby of the 808 is for sound effects, not sound quality). None of the mobile phones released by Nokia have independent sound processing chips. I miss Nokia very much. The previous xpressmusic series.

In my opinion, the only advantage of Symbian is that it can run real multitasks and will not stop running in the background.

If you just want to take pictures, don’t play games or surf the Internet, and just make calls and send text messages, you can consider it, and it is also very collectible. I don’t know when the next mobile phone can catch up with the 808’s photography level. Only then can it come out.

808 recording is very good, two-channel, no popping sound, any recorder can be laid off. Recording and taking photos are the biggest features of 808, and they are also the main areas of advertising.