How to judge the similarity of civil servants' examination papers?

Recently, a candidate in Tianjin passed the civil service examination interview and political examination, but was told that the written test had "identical papers" and the results were invalid. After the incident was exposed, the controversy about the "identical paper" of the civil service examination was concerned by public opinion. How to judge the similarity of civil service examination papers? How to ensure an open and fair evaluation? How can candidates complain if they are not satisfied with "similarity"?

Data map?

Controversy: Controversy about "the same quantity"

Recently, the media reported that Zhao, a 22-year-old female college student, took part in this year's civil service examination in Tianjin. After successfully passing the written test, qualification review, physical fitness test, interview, physical examination and political examination, she suddenly received a notice from Tianjin Talent Evaluation Center, because the written test papers were the same and the results were invalid.

Zhao told the media that he did not plagiarize or assist others to plagiarize. According to reports, after the incident, Zhao asked to check the "same test paper", and the answer was that it could not be checked according to regulations. The relevant offices of Tianjin Human Resources and Social Security Bureau responded that similar testing standards are mastered by third-party institutions, and all materials cannot be made public and can only be presented to the court. If Zhao refuses to accept it, he can sue in court.

According to the examination arrangement, the written test results of the recruitment of civil servants in Tianjin in May this year have been announced. So, who will identify the similarity of the test paper? Why can't we publish the appraisal evidence to the candidates? Why did you inform the candidates after the interview, political review and other links? After the incident was exposed, the question about "the same volume" triggered discussion among netizens.

The reporter found that in this year's recruitment of civil servants in various provinces, many places reported the investigation and punishment of cheating on "similar test papers". For example, Fujian reported that 10 people had the same test papers in the civil service exam, and Shaanxi also reported that eight candidates had the same answers in the provincial civil service exam. The notice about the "same volume" of the civil service examination is mostly on the occasion of the release of the written test results.

Data Map: 2016165438+10 On October 27th, candidates queued to enter the examination room in a national civil service examination center in Taiyuan, Shanxi.

Background: Cheating on the same paper is prohibited for at least five years.

Regarding the handling of "identical test papers" in civil service examinations, the reporter found that the Measures for Handling Disciplinary Acts in Civil Service Examinations issued and implemented on June 10 last year added provisions for handling identical test papers.

The "Measures" stipulate that in the marking process, it is found that the answers of candidates to the same subject are similar and confirmed by the marking expert group, and the examination institution that specifically organizes the examination will give the examination results of this subject (time period) invalid treatment. According to the regulations, candidates who have the same answer in the same subject and have other relevant evidence to prove their cheating are not allowed to apply for civil servants for five years until their life, depending on the specific circumstances.

This year, in the recruitment of provincial examinations for civil servants organized by various provinces, many places have also started the screening of similar papers for the first time.

For example, in April this year, Qinghai Personnel Testing Center issued "Instructions for Candidates", which specifically pointed out that after the civil service recruitment examination, technical means will be used to conduct similarity tests, and candidates who are identified as having the same answer (including plagiarism) will have invalid test scores in this subject.

This year, Shandong has also added the screening link of the same answer sheet in the written examination marking, clearly giving those who violate discipline and discipline the qualification to cancel this year's examination, and the examination results will be invalid until those who are investigated for criminal responsibility according to law are not (cancelled) employed.

Data Map: 2016165438+2065438+07 written test for civil servants of central organs and their directly affiliated institutions.

Inquiry: What are the criteria for judging "identical papers"?

As for the criteria for judging "identical papers", the Measures for Handling Disciplinary Actions in Civil Servant Examination and Employment issued by Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security mentioned above only specify "the specific ways and criteria for examination institutions at or above the provincial level to determine the identical answers".

According to experts, in the civil service examination, the criteria for judging the similarity of papers are divided into subjective questions and objective questions. For example, in the subjective test paper, candidates' answers to the same subject, including written expressions or main right and wrong points, are highly consistent; As far as the objective test paper is concerned, there is a high degree of consistency between the choices and scribbled answers of more than two candidates on the objective test paper.

Experts said that in order to ensure the openness and fairness of the civil service examination, the state has standardized on many levels, such as technology, manpower, test paper setting, law and protection of rights and interests afterwards. For example, the competent departments of civil servants strengthen the supervision of examinations, improve the level of technical prevention to ensure the safety of examinations, prevent organized cheating in grouping questions such as one question and multiple volumes, and detect candidates' answer information through professional institutions to identify identical papers.

Then, when should the same test paper be notified to the candidates? The identification of the same paper needs to be confirmed by the marking experts, and the identification itself takes some time. Moreover, some candidates will appeal after reporting the same papers. Therefore, the processing progress of each place is different.

Data map?

Follow-up: How do candidates complain if they are not satisfied with "similarity"?

In the above-mentioned dispute over the "identical papers" of Tianjin civil service candidates, many netizens questioned why candidates asked to read the "identical papers", and even some netizens questioned whether there was "radish recruitment". However, some netizens think that it is understandable to reject the test paper: "So many candidates think that their scores are low and they have made mistakes, and the time and labor costs are too great."

"As far as the current regulations in China are concerned, after the civil service examination, there is no reason for anyone to check the civil service examination paper again. Even if the application is approved, the staff will review it, and my own test paper will not be seen. " Experts said.

However, according to experts, if candidates have objections to the appraisal results of the same volume, according to the Measures for Handling Disciplinary Actions in Civil Service Examinations, applicants who are dissatisfied with the decision on handling disciplinary actions may apply for administrative reconsideration or bring an administrative lawsuit according to law.

According to the regulations, before making a decision on the applicant's violation of discipline and discipline, the applicant should be informed of the decision to be made and the relevant facts, reasons and basis, and informed that the applicant has the right to state and defend according to law. The competent department of civil servants, the recruitment agency or the examination institution that made the decision shall review the facts, reasons and evidence put forward by the candidates.

The reporter consulted the Decision on Handling Violation of Discipline in Civil Service Examination and Employment issued by Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security in August 2065438+2006. It is clear in the decision that those who are dissatisfied with the decision may apply for administrative reconsideration within 60 days from the date of receiving the decision, or bring an administrative lawsuit within 6 months from the date of receiving the decision.

Since we can deal with duplicate papers, we can only solve the problem through legal channels, believing that the law is fair and just.