Do the three major operators have monopolistic behaviors?

it is sometimes quite helpless to have only three major operators to choose.

every move of China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom affects the hearts of hundreds of millions of consumers. At present, the lives of most Chinese people are inseparable from voice calls, short messages, traffic and other value-added and extended services of operators. But for many years, the three major operators have always been in a monopoly position. The "one-word-for-one" management and operation mode has made them criticized by users, but they still have not made qualitative progress. Only after the government began to "move the knife" on operators did it begin to have new changes.

Among them, the most important measures are tariff reduction and unclear traffic. However, the various measures launched by operators are more like "dealing with official business", which is far from achieving the ideal effect in the minds of users. The original intention was to reduce the monopoly position of the three major operators. I didn't expect the consequences caused by unclear traffic to make their monopoly tighter and tighter.

from three-thirds of the world to marriage, the three operators are getting closer and closer

The historical development track of China Mobile, China Unicom and the three major mobile operators can be described as ups and downs. To put it simply, in the 2G era, mobile is the only one, and China Unicom and China Telecom are all "accompanying the prince to study"; In the 3G era, China Unicom's WCDMA stood out, while China Unicom suppressed China Mobile because it adopted its own TD network standard and the signal was extremely poor. Although the number of users was still the highest, it did not reach the favorable rate of China Unicom's users. In the 4G era, mobile has returned to its dominant position, and China Unicom and China Telecom have been beaten again.