The owner of the food stall was robbed and killed in the elevator in the early morning, and her husband actually sued the security guard. What's the inside story?

The reason why the deceased's husband wanted to sue the security guard was that the negligence of the security guard's duties indirectly caused the death of the deceased, but it was more than that. First, the husband of the deceased dictated

Mr. Liu and his wife, Ms. Zhang, who came from Fuzhou, Jiangxi Province, run a food stall in Jinjiang City, Fujian Province. In the early morning of May 27th, Mr. Liu went home after purchasing all the ingredients he needed for the next day. At three o'clock in the morning, he received a phone call from his wife, who was at her friend's house, asking Mr. Liu to go downstairs in advance and wait for her in the underground garage, and then go to eat supper together.

after four or five minutes, Mr. Liu called Ms. Zhang, and Ms. Zhang said that she would arrive soon. As a result, after three or five minutes, Ms. Zhang did not show up. Feeling that something was wrong, Mr. Liu quickly called Ms. Zhang and sent a WeChat message, but Ms. Zhang did not reply. Later, Mr. Liu hurried to the security room to explain the situation to the security guard, and asked to see the monitoring. The security guard asked Mr. Liu to look for it again on the grounds that he was too busy to leave, and asked if it was because the husband and wife quarreled. After looking for it for a while, Mr. Liu couldn't find it and came to the security room.

at about four o'clock in the morning, Mr. Liu still asked to check the monitoring, but the security guard still refused to let him continue to call because he couldn't leave. As a result, Ms. Zhang's mobile phone was turned off. The security guard found someone to check the monitoring when he felt that something was wrong. The monitoring showed that at about 3: 6 in the morning, a thin man followed Ms. Zhang into the elevator, and then was held hostage in the elevator. On the fifth floor, the man dragged Ms. Zhang out of the elevator and brutally killed Ms. Zhang on the sixth floor.

Mr. Liu thinks that Ms. Zhang may not be killed if the security guard found out earlier that a murderer was preparing to commit a crime and stopped it by voice. The police arrived at the community around five o'clock and arrested the suspect at seven o'clock in the morning. When the suspect was arrested, the suspect was still preparing to dig a hole and bury the body. It was initially concluded that it was murder for money, and the suspect was once a security guard in this community and was arrested for theft. Second, there are many doubts

First of all, Mr. Liu said that he went home after preparing the ingredients. His wife called him to wait for her in the garage at three o'clock, and Mr. Liu arrived at the garage at three o'clock. Is it true that Mr. Liu was not at home in such a short time and has been wandering downstairs?

the second question is, since it came from a friend's house, why didn't you call your friend when you couldn't get through to Ms. Zhang, and then you didn't call your friend when you knew that Ms. Zhang might have an accident? Isn't it more strength to find one more person? Normal people's thinking should be to call a friend first to ask if she has gone out and decide what's going on.

the third doubt is that Mr. Liu actually wants to check the monitoring at the first time. The normal idea should be to call Ms. Zhang first, wait after I can't get through, and then call her friend. If I can't get through, I will ask if her friend is still out, then look for it, and finally check the monitoring. It's a bit strange for Mr. Liu to ask for the monitoring directly, omitting all the intermediate steps and going directly to the final destination.

However, the deceased is the most important, and the murderer will be punished by law. It also reminds the netizens that they must travel together at night, not alone.