The court reported that a woman was divorced by an impostor. Did the Civil Affairs Bureau fail to recognize the case, or did it collude to commit the crime?

The court informed that the woman was divorced by an impostor

Ms. Wu’s husband asked him to go to the court to participate in divorce mediation, but she did not want a divorce, so she did not go. However, the next day However, Ms. Wu received a text message from the court informing her that the case had been concluded and divorce was allowed. Ms. Wu went to the court to verify and found out that her husband had found someone to impersonate her and divorced her. Later, the court issued an incident report. The current incident Still in the follow-up process! Whose responsibility is this?

There is no doubt that in this matter, Ms. Wu is the victim, and her husband and the impostor are the masterminds, and the court did not take the step of verifying the identity. For this reason, some people complained, "These are irresponsible people who earn high salaries. They are having too much fun, handling things in a mess, and not taking things seriously. But what I want to say is that those who posted these remarks Man, it’s really funny. The ID photos are from several years ago, and they are without makeup. Sometimes, I’m afraid I can’t even recognize myself, let alone someone else. When the judge checked the identity, he only noticed The authenticity of the identity document, but one point, why Ms. Wu’s identity card was in the hands of others, is also debatable.

Moreover, it was during the epidemic, and the impostor, When I came to handle matters, I also wore a mask and did not ask the other party to take off the mask. However, the court also issued an announcement on the matter as soon as possible, admitted the mistake, and actively coordinated. I believe that Ms. Wu will be given a satisfactory answer in the end.

In this incident, the original judge was suspended for investigation, the case was retried, and the plaintiff and the impostor were punished. The replacement was punished with fines and detention. It must be said that this judge is still a bit of a disaster. Of course, it cannot be ruled out that he was careless in his work, but he was really tricked. This also gives us a warning: You have to be careful, you may be tricked by accident. I have facial blindness and I have to be careful. If I wear a mask when I meet a stranger, I may admit my mistake. The strong melon is really not sweet.

Judging from the current situation, the result is quite good. In fact, Ms. Wu’s marriage cannot be saved. Receiving state compensation is also a consolation. We have no way of knowing the relationship between Ms. Wu and her husband. However, As for the incident itself, Ms. Wu herself probably felt disgraced. Even if her husband broke the law and found someone to replace him, he still wanted to divorce her, but she was still unwilling to do so. It seemed that she was wronged, but it seemed that It's very sad. It's definitely not one person's fault that the marriage of two people has reached this point. Since you have decided to be together, please cherish it

It is extremely wonderful that two people can be together and enter the palace of marriage. Great fate, since we have decided to be together, we should work together to run this small family well, cherish each other, try our best to use our strengths and strengths, and live a good life.