Joke Collection Website - Blessing messages - Views from all parties on the WeChat charging incident
Views from all parties on the WeChat charging incident
WeChat should be free. Jiang Qiping, secretary-general of the Information Technology Research Center of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said that whether users use WeChat through 2G or 3G networks or through fixed lines, users have already paid the monthly fee and traffic. fee, so WeChat should certainly be free. Consumer interests have been ignored. Kaifu Lee posted on Weibo about the WeChat charging dispute, saying, "Before WeChat appeared, Tencent and operators were generally happy because both parties made money from it. But the emergence of WeChat , not only 'occupies scarce network signaling resources', but also affects the operators' cheese. Both paid voice services and SMS services have been affected. "Li Kaifu believes that so far, no one seems to be really interested. Pay attention to the interests of consumers.
Financial writer Cui Lin said on Weibo: "Regarding WeChat charging, first, WeChat has already charged traffic fees, and further charges are repeated charges without any legal basis. Second, WeChat charging will undoubtedly destroy innovative products. In the current situation where mobile applications are emerging one after another, WeChat’s customers will drop off a cliff in a few days. Third, under the premise that free Internet is the mainstream trend, WeChat’s charging OTT business goes against the trend. Charging is an inevitable trend in industrial development. At the Trend Dialogue Theme Salon held on the evening of March 25, 2013, Shi Wei, Director of the Industrial Research Office of the Institute of Economic System and Management of the National Development and Reform Commission, Zeng Jianqiu, Professor of the School of Economics and Management of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, and Telecom of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology Chen Jinqiao, deputy chief engineer of the institute, and other experts agree that charging OTT services and their providers is an inevitable trend in industry development, but how to charge should be determined by the market itself. Operators have reason to charge Tencent. Bao Ran, a member of the Expert Committee of the Interactive Media Industry Alliance, said that operators have reason to charge Tencent. What they charge is not the traffic fee but the fee caused by the pressure of the signaling storm. He said: “The message (WeChat) is very small and does not occupy much bandwidth, but when it occurs frequently, especially when it occurs frequently among hundreds of millions of users, it is bound to put a certain amount of pressure on our traditional voice communication network. Even great communication security. "WeChat's increased costs for operators are much higher than their revenue. On April 7, 2013, Wang Jianzhou, former chairman of China Mobile, attended the Boao Forum and said that although OTT services such as WeChat have brought great benefits to operators. A large amount of traffic has indeed significantly increased the cost of network investment for operators. The operator's increased investment costs are far greater than the revenue from traffic. WeChat charges may still be free only for Tencent users. Senior IT industry commentator Li Hua said that because many WeChat users choose to use WeChat on Wi-Fi networks, and many OTT products also support use on PCs and even web pages, it is necessary to calculate the information. For orders and traffic occupation, a comprehensive and scientific charging system needs to be established. Li Hua believes that even if the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology agrees to charge WeChat, it will most likely only be charged for Tencent, and the majority of users will still use it for free. Computer Society of China: The three major telecom operators are suspected of double charging. On April 6, 2013, the Computer Society of China issued a special statement in Beijing on the "WeChat charging" incident, objecting to the three major telecom basic operators' WeChat charging, believing that this is a scam. In the struggle for interests between monopolies and private enterprises, there is no basis for the three major state-owned basic telecommunications operators to try to increase the number of charges without going through relevant legal procedures. They are suspected of double charging. It is recommended that the state strengthen the supervision of monopolistic behaviors in the telecommunications field. supervision.
- Previous article:Can wechat be set to log in without SMS verification code?
- Next article:How does Apple encrypt short messages?
- Related articles
- What if I can't receive the verification code of Weibo login SMS? Please crack it!
- Why did Alipay recharge the phone bill but it didn't arrive?
- Can laid-off and unemployed soldiers get compensation after New Year's Day?
- What does the credit test of individual industrial and commercial households mean?
- How do you know the toll booth on the highway?
- The girl I like was scolded and cried by me. What happened?
- 30 yuan, can you cancel the express delay?
- Selected 100 customer birthday greetings.
- Why did I add a message that can't be sent in in groups?
- The bank sent a text message saying that the transaction restrictions caused by abnormal account transactions have been lifted. Is it possible to use the bank card normally?