Graduation thesis comments tutor comments

1, the topic is in line with the training goal of administrative management specialty, and it can better comprehensively apply social theory and professional knowledge. The writing attitude of the thesis is serious and responsible. The content of the paper is sufficient, the relevant reference materials are sufficient, and the hierarchical structure is reasonable. The main points are prominent, the logical points are clear, and the language expression is fluent. But the depth of the argument is not enough.

2, the learning attitude is more serious, strictly abide by the school rules. The project design can be completed within the specified time, and the requirements put forward in the task book are well met. The demonstration effect is good. The writing format of the paper is relatively standardized. The interface design is reasonable and the documents are complete. Recommend graduation project as well.

3. The student can successfully complete the graduation design task, the scheme is reasonable, the method is correct, and he can comprehensively use the knowledge he has learned to analyze and solve practical problems. In the process of graduation design, the attitude is correct, the thesis argument is correct, the argument is sufficient, the software design conforms to the engineering specification, and the list of documents and procedures is complete. Recommend graduation design as excellent.

4. The topic of this paper meets the requirements of administrative management specialty and fully reflects the needs of social reality. The full text is reasonable in structure, clear in thinking and correct in viewpoint, which can organically combine the professional knowledge of administrative management with the problems to be analyzed and demonstrated. The materials consulted in the writing process of this paper are not only sufficient but also closely combined with the theme. However, the format is not standardized and the case demonstration is not enough.

5. The topics are completely consistent, the arguments are prominent, and the discussion is closely related to the theme. The language expression is fluent, and the format fully meets the requirements of the specification; Rich references and strong timeliness; There is no plagiarism.