The difference between punishment according to law and delay according to law

The difference between punishment according to law and procrastination according to law lies in the way and time to deal with illegal acts. The former is to impose direct legal sanctions on illegal acts, and the latter is to postpone the handling procedure to better ensure the fairness and accuracy of the procedure. These two methods are carried out under the legal framework, aiming at maintaining social order and public interests.

Punishment according to law and delay according to law are two commonly used terms in the legal field, which involve the handling methods and procedures of illegal acts. I will explain the difference between these two concepts in detail below.

First of all, punishment according to law refers to the process of legally punishing those responsible for illegal acts. This punishment can be a fine, detention, fixed-term imprisonment, etc. , and the specific punishment depends on different legal provisions. Punishment according to law is a direct response to illegal acts, aiming at maintaining social order and public interests through punishment.

And procrastination according to law refers to the act of delaying or delaying the handling procedure of illegal acts. This delay may be due to the need of investigation and evidence collection, or to wait for more evidence or related information to appear. Delaying according to law does not mean not taking action against illegal acts, but postponing the time to take action to a more appropriate time. The purpose of this is to ensure that the procedures for handling illegal acts are more perfect and accurate.

To sum up, the difference between punishment according to law and delay according to law lies in the way and time to deal with illegal acts. The former is to impose direct legal sanctions on illegal acts, and the latter is to postpone the handling procedure to better ensure the fairness and accuracy of the procedure. These two methods are carried out under the legal framework, aiming at maintaining social order and public interests.

The difference between punishment according to law and procrastination according to law is that they involve the difference between legal sanctions and procedural delays. Punishing according to law means punishing illegal acts according to law in order to maintain social order and justice. This method is usually to investigate, judge and judge through legal channels after the illegal act occurs, so as to ensure that the crime is punished as it should be. Legal delay refers to postponing the trial, handling or ruling of a case to a later time according to specific circumstances and procedural requirements. This may be due to insufficient evidence, the need for further investigation and complex legal issues. Although both are carried out according to law, punishment according to law puts more emphasis on timely and decisive sanctions against illegal acts, while delay according to law pays more attention to procedural compliance and full investigation of facts.

Legal basis:

Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China (202 1 Amendment);

Chapter IV Jurisdiction and Application of Administrative Punishment

Twenty-fourth provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the central government may, according to the local actual situation, decide to entrust the administrative punishment power of the county-level people's government departments that are in urgent need of grass-roots management to the township people's governments and sub-district offices that can effectively undertake it, and organize regular assessments. The decision should be made public. Township people's governments and sub-district offices that bear the power of administrative punishment shall strengthen the construction of law enforcement capacity and implement administrative punishment in accordance with the prescribed scope and legal procedures. The relevant local people's governments and their departments should strengthen organization and coordination, professional guidance and law enforcement supervision, establish and improve the coordination mechanism of administrative punishment, and improve the evaluation system.