Which state-owned enterprise leaders have you seen playing tricks?

No, because I have never worked in a state-owned enterprise. Leaders are often our immediate superiors, and these people have great rights, such as personnel rights, financial rights and rewards and punishments. Sometimes they may use these rights to punish some disobedient subordinates. Today we will talk about the routine of attracting strokes.

First of all, doing one thing right is often out of line. Some people will skip their immediate supervisor after work and report directly to their boss. If they meet such subordinates, as his boss will certainly be unhappy, so the boss will use this routine to punish them.

They may keep silent and let you decide. You know they know more, but they don't make a sound. Aren't you going to skip me? Then you can see for yourself. If there is a mistake, it is just right. I'll give you trouble directly. If your leader tells you something, don't take it seriously, and don't think it is the trust of the leader. Unless the evidence is real and valid. Otherwise, leaders seem to trust but forgive mistakes.

Secondly, many leaders are narrow-minded and virtually suppress some people who may replace themselves. You know, the workplace is like a battlefield, and you may crush your leader one day. So at this time, leaders will use some invisible hands to suppress some people who are easy to threaten themselves.

The way to suppress is often to entrust you with a heavy responsibility and then watch you make mistakes. During this period, the workload is constantly increasing, which is called training. At the same time, I will go to the superior leader to say good things about my subordinates. In the end, I may not even have a chance to become a regular. The leaders seem to be shouldering the heavy responsibility of cultivating, but the added task is not cultivating, but squeezing in the wrong place and waiting for the busy.

In addition, people and employees have contradictory routines, and there are also contradictory people in the workplace, but as leaders, they have absolute power. If they see who may threaten their position, they may be sent as assistants. In this case, it seems to give extra help to subordinates, but in fact it is monitored or even a time bomb.

If your leader has this tendency, you'd better ask who to assign to help, so as not to let the leader have a chance to mix sand. After all, people you know will cooperate with each other more efficiently.