Formulation of evaluation scheme for Xuesida lecture notes

I was very surprised when I learned that Mr. Zhang Jing asked us to organize and undertake the task of evaluating relief supplies. I feel that this is generally something that experts can do, but teacher Zhang Jing said, one is that we all know the production process of Xuesida handouts and have practice, so we can put forward some suggestions; Another is that passing the evaluation will be another great promotion, which can promote each other and give us a good opportunity for self-organization and growth. I can exercise, study and improve. Even if not, I have a very good team behind me. I can overcome the difficulties if I want to try. So I accepted this challenging task.

To tell the truth, I know nothing about the evaluation scheme and I don't know what to do next. On the evening of September 6th, I first discussed and explained this task with President Liu Yunzhou. Liu suggested that I make a short plan first, and then the Committee will discuss it together. I said, I can't make a plan. I need Liu's help. The next morning, Liu sent the preliminary review framework.

On the evening of September 7th (Friday), the board of directors was called into the live broadcast room for discussion. After school starts, everyone is busy with their work. Although only six or seven people came that night, after consulting with Mr. Wang and Mr. Li, we determined the number of groups for the evaluation of handouts, the approximate time period of initial evaluation, re-evaluation and final evaluation, and determined the work to be done now: recruiting personnel. With people, we can make the next standard and work. So I decided to openly recruit and contact privately.

After the live broadcast, we had further communication with Mr. Wang Xiaohuan. According to the results of the discussion and the recruitment plan, Teacher Wang Xiaohuan wrote the recruitment announcement of "Reviewer of Xuesida Lectures", which was sent to the village Xiaoliu WeChat group and our self-organized rural practice group on 1 1 in the afternoon. We look forward to your joining us.

Unexpectedly, no one signed up. The next day, the board of directors issued a notice, and the most important thing now is to find someone.

I didn't know why everyone didn't sign up until I contacted the invited teachers in private: First, I was busy with work and didn't have time, fearing that I couldn't concentrate on it; Second, I feel that I am unprofessional and dare not be competent for this job. Everyone is willing to join in when the situation is explained. Although they knew it was difficult, they all said that as long as they joined, they would make time to do it well. Thanks to the teachers who accepted the invitation and the directors who were responsible for contacting the staff, the teachers further contacted the more suitable candidates they were familiar with after joining. With Qi Xin's concerted efforts, on the evening of September 8th, the Wechat group of Xuesida's judging panel was established, and 24 people were recruited that night.

Together with the partners who have already joined the evaluation, we began to discuss the formulation of evaluation standards in the group. According to your own understanding and practice of the production of Xuesida handouts, combined with the submitted handout homework examples, and invited Mr. Zhang Huicheng as a guide, the specific details were supplemented and improved within the original framework. On the evening of September 8, the evaluation criteria were basically formed.

Recruitment will continue on September 9 (Sunday). On the evening of September 9, 30 judges were recruited, just in time to form six five-person teams.

At noon on September 10, the group discussed the audit process. Everyone began to argue about the definition of initial evaluation results, and there were three opinions: excellent, qualified, eliminated, excellent, excellent, qualified, excellent, excellent+and excellent++. Teacher Qi Tuoyu disagreed with the elimination and felt that we did not have the ability and qualification to identify. Teacher Jie Chen thinks that homework should be qualified as long as it is handed in, because it is better than not handing it in; Some teachers think that as long as they contribute, they should be considered excellent, and then they will be selected as excellent ... If you think about it carefully, everyone has a point. In fact, no matter which definition, the evaluation criteria are the same. Besides, the main purpose of our evaluation is to learn well, point out sexual problems and promote each other, and the results are not the most important. Later, it was determined to be excellent and average, which was indicated by the letter AB. Five judges in each group can be rated as excellent as long as they get three A's. During the re-evaluation, they will select the best handout from each group's excellent handouts. At the final review, they will choose the best handout from the group and submit it to the teacher team of Zhang Huicheng for comment. However, every handout should have advantages, suggestions for improvement, comprehensive comments and grade definitions.

We'll discuss it in the evening of September 10. After the basic process is decided, we will start grouping. Everyone enters the corresponding group according to their respective disciplines. Establish a team leader who is responsible for distributing and summarizing handouts. At that time, the evaluation process was: initial evaluation for one week, and exchange evaluation in turn; Re-evaluate for a week and choose excellent lecture notes; The final evaluation will last for one week, and the judges will judge the best handout. After it was announced in the group, everyone began to work together. Before going to bed 1 1, I received the voice of Teacher Wang Xiaohuan. Regarding the evaluation process, the two discussed for 92 minutes how to better reflect the objectivity of the evaluation. Later, everyone agreed that the exchange of comments in turn would make the first commentator's point of view dominant, and the last four commentators would be influenced by the comments given earlier, and the meaning of the five comments would be lost. So, I thought of changing the review by turns into all reviews, and finally handed it over to the team leader for summary. The group leader defines statistical summary according to the grade of each handout and obtains excellent handouts. Then, all the comments of the five judges are packaged and fed back to the author of the handout. In this way, each reviewer can give full play to his opinions without being influenced by others, and each lecture writer can receive comments from five people, which not only understands the effect of his lecture in different people's eyes, but also absorbs the careful suggestions of five reviewers, which is of great help to his future production of lectures. The more they discussed, the better the plan was, so they decided to change the rotation review to full review and finally make a summary. The initial evaluation is extended to two weeks, and the final evaluation is one week. And decided to explain the specific operation of review to everyone in the live broadcast room the next night to avoid unnecessary trouble or rework in the future.

On the morning of September 1 1, the group sent a notice telling everyone to review the specific operation of the process in the live broadcast room at night. Those who don't reply will call to ensure full participation. At noon, I reported the final revision of the scheme to Mr. Zhang Jing and got the consent. After reading the replies in the group, there were 12 teachers who didn't have time to read WeChat. So, check the student handbook and send text messages one by one. At six o'clock in the evening, the two teachers did not return text messages, but called. In the evening, except for Mr. Hu Gangqiang, who was unable to attend because of something at home, all the other teachers were listening in the live broadcast room.

After making sure that everyone has made clear the rules and operations, the review groups of various disciplines will make overall arrangements and improvements. Finally, the number of judges is ***3 1, and the English comprehensive group is increased to six because there is only one, so that you can avoid your own handouts. There are 3 other language groups and 2 math groups, all of which are 5 people. Each team leader will set up a group and distribute handouts. If you have your own handouts, the group leader will transfer them to other groups. The initial evaluation started at 9: 00 pm on September 1 1 and is scheduled to be completed on September 24th.

93 handouts, 365,438+0 reviewers and 6 review teams. Each reviewer should review 65,438+05 handouts within two weeks of the initial review, with an average of at least 65,438+0 handouts per day. It takes at least 1 hour to finish reading each one. And these jobs need the teachers and principals who participate in the evaluation to take time out to do after completing their own work. There are also teachers who take care of the baby and do it while taking care of it. Moved by everyone's responsibility, learning the lecture notes of Starr once again gathered everyone's energy, growing up in commitment and being happy in growth. I hope this review will bring you more gains, and I also look forward to the wonderful problem design, comments and suggestions, the collision between words and ideas, and the iterative update of thinking during the review of handouts. ...