What's the difference between an interview and an exhortation conversation? Is the interview a punishment?

Perhaps unexpectedly, a seemingly simple conversation will be divided into several kinds, each with different meanings, and each way is different from the interviewee. There is also a big difference between an interview and a admonishing conversation. Different situations have different ways of speaking to different people.

What's the difference between an interview and an exhortation conversation?

Interview? This is a very popular word in recent years. The conversation of the Commission for Discipline Inspection often scares the problem officials, so that there is a saying circulating on the Internet. What are you afraid of, that the Commission for Discipline Inspection will talk to you? Although it is a ridicule, it reveals the strength of the Commission for Discipline Inspection.

Interview refers to a quasi-specific administrative act in which the organs with specific administrative powers correct and standardize the problems existing in the operation of subordinate organizations through interviews, communication, study of policies and regulations, analysis and evaluation. Reporters are searching online? Interview? It is found that the Ministry of Environmental Protection, the Ministry of Communications and other ministries have interviewed relevant officials, but the interview mechanism of the Commission for Discipline Inspection is quite mysterious.

It is not so easy to talk about education reminders, letters and visits, and admonishing conversations.

Admonishing conversation, the conversation will listen to the interviewee's explanation and explanation of relevant issues, admonish and exhort them through the conversation, solemnly point out the existing problems to them, and urge them to correct their mistakes within the prescribed time limit.

Conversation and inquiry is one of the ways for discipline inspection and supervision organs to deal with clues reflecting problems, and the atmosphere is much more tense. Mainly refers to the general problems reflected, which can only be given a lighter punishment or criticized and educated, or the problems reflected are untrue and clarified; Reflect general problems, mostly hearsay or subjective speculation, which is difficult to verify.

Dialogue mode:

There are two interview methods: one-on-one interview and group interview.

Education reminder talks, letters and visits talks, and organization investigation talks are all individual talks, that is, one-on-one talks, while pre-appointment talks on clean government and admonishing talks are both individual talks and collective talks. There are many ways to talk and ask questions. Please explain when sending the letter; 2, in charge of the leadership or room leadership and conversation; 3. The main person in charge of the party committee talks with him; 4, entrust the lower discipline inspection and supervision organs to talk.

Talk to:

The interview contents include interviews with members of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and secretaries of the disciplinary committees of provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities by leading comrades of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection; The higher-level discipline inspection department interviews the person in charge of the lower-level discipline inspection team and the secretary of the discipline inspection commission; The higher-level discipline inspection department interviewed the top leaders of the lower-level party committees.

Admonishing conversation is mainly about talking and admonishing education to party member cadres who have slight violations of discipline or problems with signs and tendencies.

Is the interview a punishment?

It is understood that conversation is a common way of working for disciplinary committees at all levels. According to the existing public reports, there are six ways for the Commission for Discipline Inspection to talk: education reminding talk, admonishing talk, honest talk before taking office, letters and visits talk, talks and inquiries, and organization investigation talk.

The website of the Supervision Department of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection recently released "Strictly administering the Party in an All-round Way, Practice? Four forms? Sixth: deepening? Three turns? "The direction. The article said that in history, the way we managed the party was also diversified, not just punishment. Supervision and discipline? Four forms? Frequent reminders, interviews and even light punishments should be the main work of the Commission for Discipline Inspection, and filing a case for investigation can only be a very few disposal methods. No one fell into the abyss of serious violation of discipline and law from the beginning. Party organizations can't hide when they hear the reflection of cadres' problems. They can prevent them from falling further by reminding them of their problems and asking them to explain to the organization, or by criticizing and self-criticizing at the democratic life meeting.

The article pointed out that using? Four forms? We must look at the problem from a political perspective and judge the political ecology of a place, instead of just focusing on it? Trees? Didn't you see it? Forest? , also can't let emotions affect reason, instead of the party's policies and strategies.

The specific full text is as follows:

All the work of the discipline inspection organs is carried out around the central task of the party in a period, and must be grasped from the political and overall situation. Practice? Four forms? The responsibility of the Commission for Discipline Inspection is not light, but heavy. The intensity of discipline is not small, but greater. It is necessary to deepen the transformation from function to style, improve ideological and political level and grasp policy ability.

Is the change of ideas and the improvement of understanding deepening? Three turns? Premise. Good practice? Four forms? It is to strictly manage the party in an all-round way and always maintain its advanced nature and purity. Disciplinary committees at all levels should proceed from the fundamental purpose of realizing the historical mission of the Party, deeply understand the connotation of strictly administering the Party and governing the Party according to regulations, and deepen their understanding of the responsibilities entrusted to the Disciplinary Committee by party constitution. The transfer function must be coordinated with the transfer method, otherwise the function transfer is not in place, or even the transfer is only formal. In history, the way we run the party is also diversified, not just punishment. Supervision and discipline? Four forms? Frequent reminders, interviews and even light punishments should be the main work of the Commission for Discipline Inspection, and filing a case for investigation can only be a very few disposal methods.

No one fell into the abyss of serious violation of discipline and law from the beginning. Party organizations can't hide when they hear the reflection of cadres' problems. They can prevent them from falling further by reminding them of their problems and asking them to explain to the organization, or by criticizing and self-criticizing at the democratic life meeting. Comrades who violate discipline slightly may be adjusted or given a lighter punishment. This kind of punishment is to save lives, and the loss to the cause of the party and the cadres themselves will be much smaller. We should really put discipline ahead, highlight the characteristics of discipline, focus on solving problems in political discipline and organizational discipline, make party member cadres feel awe and stop doing things, let cadres with problems correct their mistakes, and let cadres without problems receive education and warning. In the long run, we can create a good atmosphere of strictly administering the party and truly reverse the situation of lax organizational discipline.

The legal interview is mainly about inquiry and investigation. As long as the interviewee himself is not involved in legal issues. There will be no punishment, but for the members of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the secretaries of the disciplinary committees of all provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities, if they are interviewed, they should be psychologically prepared and given different treatment according to the seriousness of the case.