Is it objective idealism or subjective idealism when a magpie cries out and a crow cries out?

"The magpie cries out and the crow crows mourning" is more inclined to objective idealism;

Reason:

Idealism should have nothing to explain, Besides, it was also identified in the question; let’s talk about why it is objective idealism.

The calls of magpies are more rhythmic, and magpies are also more beautiful, especially when they are flapping their wings; while crows have a monotonous call, the sound is not pleasant, and there is no sense of rhythm. The black "coat" worn by crows neither looks good nor sounds good. Based on this objective fact, people idealistically believe that magpies are happy and crows are depressed.

As for "the left eye will lead to disaster, the right eye will lead to wealth", it is more inclined to subjective idealism.

Reason: No need to explain idealism;

Unlike the above example, there is no essential difference between the left eye and the right eye (disregarding the unfamiliar facts) According to medical understanding), there is neither a difference in sound nor a difference in appearance. It is mainly based on customary sayings. There is no objective difference, so it is said to be subjective idealism.