A woman in Tangshan opened a cram school and many parents of students tested positive for nucleic acid. How to evaluate the behavior of the person involved?

During the epidemic prevention and control period, Li, a retired female teacher in Tangshan, regardless of the risk of epidemic spread, privately opened cram schools, which led to the diagnosis of many students and parents. The woman has been detained. The woman’s behavior not only lacks action Ordinary citizens have no sense of responsibility and professional ethics, and have more seriously violated the law.

1. Li’s behavior is very selfish. During the epidemic, we as citizens have the obligation to cooperate with the work of disease control personnel. Under this situation, we must strictly abide by the local epidemic prevention and control policies. Everyone is responsible for insisting on not gathering and ensuring that the chain of epidemic infection is cut off. Therefore, for his own personal benefit, Li secretly held a cram school and gathered many students. It was wrong. During the epidemic, the economy of all walks of life was indeed affected to a certain extent. However, the temporary suspension of gatherings is to create a healthier environment in the future. Therefore, Li’s behavior lacks the consciousness of a citizen from a social and moral perspective and should be condemned.

2. Li’s behavior lacks professional ethics. Although Li is a retired teacher, he should still abide by the professional regulations of teachers. The state has clearly issued a "double reduction policy" for the education system and severely cracked down on it. In the extracurricular tutoring agency, Li not only ignored the national regulations as a teacher, but even conducted training in a place without any teaching conditions. As a teacher, he did not put the physical and mental health of students first. It can be seen that his behavior has deviated from the teacher. Under the constraints of morality, Li's behavior must be severely punished by the education system.

3. Li's behavior has violated relevant laws and he must bear corresponding responsibilities. my country's "Criminal Law" has clear provisions on Li's behavior of malicious gatherings that lead to the spread of the epidemic and concealing his itinerary. This behavior constitutes the crime of obstructing the prevention and control of infectious diseases. Li will be held criminally responsible based on the facts and the impact it caused. This also warns us that whether as ordinary citizens or industry practitioners, we must abide by the law and cannot challenge the authority of the law.