The withdrawal of the Baijia clause will be abolished.

Because becoming a full member is profitable and the media is effective, maybe some people still don't understand, let's put it this way! There is a clear explanation in the system about the deduction standard of Baijiahao credit score. Whether it depends on you or not, we can't touch or think about it. We should pay more attention to the credit accident caused by misoperation of withdrawal.

Let's look at these five situations:

1. There is nothing wrong with the article itself, but there are typos in the content.

I've seen most of my code words, and sometimes there are homonyms with different characters, or single-word repetitive sentences are not smooth, and I just want to write high, and I don't care whether I read it or not ... After the article was published, I found several typos, just like obsessive-compulsive disorder. If you want to withdraw it, you won't publish it without modifying it.

If the manuscript is withdrawn soon after publication, the typo is corrected after withdrawal, and the title and content of the article remain unchanged. If it is published for the second time, it will not only deduct credits, but also get recommendations. But this kind of operation will definitely be recorded. As a media person, it is unforgivable to edit other words, and it is unforgivable to take out a small notebook and write it down ... The content of the article itself is fine, and it has to be withdrawn on the day of publication.

Second, there is something wrong with the article and it is forced to withdraw the manuscript.

Another problem encountered is that when it was first published, it was found that there was something wrong with this article and the system did not recommend it. Then I left. At this time, there will be two situations:

Credit points have been deducted by the system.

No credit deduction, but no recommendation.

No matter how good it felt to write these two questions at that time, the first thing to do was to withdraw decisively and stop nostalgia for this article. Press the delete button hard, write a new article again, or make a big change, from the title to the content! Either someone complained that there was something wrong with the article itself, or someone wrote it. If it is not recommended, take out a small notebook and record it again at the same volume. Either you cheated in the examination room, or you made a mistake, and the archived records were left in the middle! If you have any questions, just say them. If nobody cares, then entertain yourself. Is it too realistic?

Third, the article is defective and should be withdrawn.

This situation is that the article is obviously flawed, from the center to the title to the content, but the system did not notice it and did not recommend it. I can only say that I found a bug before, that is, I directly wrote a preview of the article and then sent it. The hydrological results along the way refer to the title of the author's first article, which was fixed the next day and then included in the key monitoring objects. From then on, I don't want to be boring in literature and art any more. ...

Fourth, the article is no problem and the operation is wrong.

This kind of operation seems to be no problem, but in fact there are many problems. For example, many people occasionally encounter original articles without problems, and the reading data is also quite good, but their hands slipped and they accidentally quit in the background. Speaking of which, I have to say the time to post! The best posting time is 9 am 15. If you write well at this time, you can directly recommend seats. Attention!

I have given up my seat, but I don't like the name. I want to change it to something more exciting ... if I want to try my mistake, just play! If it is released again, people will print it in newspapers and sell it ... is it possible to take it back and exchange it? If you want to be more exciting, you have already tried. If you take it down and change it back, OMG, it's hard to look back, as if in a dream! Are silent and suffocating. ...

Fortunately, people may just lose a little right and read data, and if they gain it, they will deduct the income from the article. If you are still angry, then the account credit branch will be deducted, and the weight will be crazy. The system will also look at the damage caused to readers after the manuscript is withdrawn. The article burst, readers are watching, and the system also recommends distributing traffic. As a result, withdrawing money is like looking for trouble!

Fifth, it is no longer an article problem, and the pure mentality has collapsed.

In short, I don't want to write after writing, and I will withdraw on a large scale!

This situation is also very difficult. After the withdrawal, it was found that all articles appeared in Netease's self-media account, and some articles were published without changing the title. I can only say that all the comments are ... I was willing to withdraw these articles, but the problem came. I submitted a lot of articles and couldn't publish them. What a pit!

What I wrote seems to outsiders to be written by others. No one was so depressed that I was speechless. Then Baidu said before canceling the account that it could no longer apply. What should I do ... new wine in old bottles, and I will start over and continue to write.

The undo key of Baijiahao is just a small function key. If it doesn't work well, it's not worth the loss. Unlike other simple mistakes, they can be corrected online in real time. In short, just remember that once they are released, they will not be withdrawn. If you really want to withdraw, just delete it and bring up another topic! Novice reprint is not as good as possible, can't help but withdraw!