If the United States withdraws from the United Nations, will the United Nations still be the United Nations?

If the United States really withdraws from the United Nations, it will bring two major consequences to the United Nations. First, 22% of the membership fees are not settled; Secondly, some decisions and resolutions will be useless and the United Nations will lose its universality.

At present, the United Nations is the largest international organization in the world. The platform it provides can make international communication more convenient and make outstanding contributions to world peace. It is a re-embodiment of the world order after World War II, and its institutional setup and mission are more scientific and reasonable than those of the earlier League of Nations.

If the United States announces its withdrawal from the United Nations, it will inevitably cause panic, and its effect may be the same as that of the United States withdrawing from the Iranian nuclear deal. The world is controlled by big countries, and the five permanent members can decide the general trend of the world and the direction of the regional situation, and according to the existing international situation.

Among the members of the United Nations and the Security Council, the stay of Britain and France will not cause much fluctuation in the international situation, but if either of China, the United States and Russia chooses to quit, the influence and practical role of the United Nations will be greatly reduced, and even become a precursor to the disintegration of post-war order.

Extended data

The United States will not withdraw from the United Nations

1. The United States will not quit the United Nations. There is a simple reason. At present, no country can completely replace the United States as the only superpower in the world and become the world police. Even if the United States withdraws from the group, it will only be a stopgap measure. It will start a new stove, organize similar organizations or draft similar treaties, and continue to maintain its hegemonic position.

Then, since the United States already has a ready-made international deliberative body, why bother to organize another set of institutions and new rules of procedure?

2. The United States really has no money, the real economy has given up, and the petrodollar has also been frustrated. The trick of printing dollar bills and owing money everywhere was seen through by others. As a result, many international organizations owe a lot of membership fees and have no confidence to speak. Everyone gets together for a meeting and decides what to do.

There must always be organizers, eating, drinking and accommodation expenses. There are so many specialized staff in international organizations that they have to travel around the world to deal with all kinds of things in the world. How can they play without money? The United States owes the most money to international organizations and is embarrassed to get along with them.

3. Secondly, many of these international organizations are developing countries, and they all stress justice and fairness, such as China and Russian, and there are also a large number of African countries and Latin American countries, which account for the vast majority of these international organizations.

More and more people feel the power of justice in China, China's idea of "One World", China's overall situation and worldview of seeking happiness for the people of the world, and increasingly resent the bullying, chauvinism, greed and extreme selfishness of the United States.

Many times, the United States insists that the United States is supreme and the United States is the first in international organizations, which is based on harming the interests and sovereignty of other countries. Therefore, those who gain the Tao help more, and those who lose the Tao help less. The influence and voice of the United States in international organizations are getting weaker and weaker, and it is becoming more and more unpopular.

Therefore, avoiding the sharp edges of China and Russia, even French, German, African countries and Latin American countries, trying to re-establish a new international organization in another sphere of influence, not only relying on the dues owed, but also making the members of the new organization obey its leadership and baton, which is the real intention of the United States.