Is it a pit for an intermediary to see a house?

Lead: When it comes to taking you, everyone should understand that some people ask whether it is necessary to spend money on buying a second-hand house and find an intermediary to see the house. In addition, some people want to ask the intermediary to take the house. What's going on here? In fact, the housing agent called to ask for housing information. Bian Xiao told you today that the intermediary will show you ten pits, hoping to help you.

The agent will show you ten pits.

Some agents want to look at the room rate, and some agents don't look at the room rate and look for it. Most of the agencies that charge for viewing houses are pits and will take you to see one or two. They all say they're satisfied when they find it. Next time you contact him, your attitude will be very bad. Anyway, he has already got the inspection fee and cheated the next one. Learn from a painful experience, and if you want to find it, you must resolutely find a house that doesn't cost money. This is official. If you want to see the room rate, you might as well find it yourself.

It is absolutely unreasonable to rent an agency fee for one month, and it is also true to provide information and services, but it is simply robbery to show people a second room, sign a contract, and then whether it is worth it or not. Lying is really ugly.

What's wrong with going to the real estate agent to see the house?

I am a practitioner, let me tell you a truth. Everyone who is not stupid knows that it is not good to get up early. Why did the agent show you the first-hand house? Isn't there a commission? The wool is on the sheep. Where did the intermediary make the money? Of course it's yours. "So let's see for ourselves, there is no middleman to make the difference." Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

Will the intermediary show me the house and sign the house have legal consequences?

Strictly speaking, the house inspection confirmation is indeed effective. Whether and how to compensate? Take a look at the terms of the house confirmation. If you don't want the intermediary to take legal action against you, there are three ways. First, don't write the name written on the confirmation letter on the real estate license after the transfer. Second, if the owner has not signed a sales contract with the intermediary, I don't think the intermediary can sue you. The owner did not entrust an intermediary to sell the house. What reason does it have to sue you? 3. If the owner signs a sales contract with the intermediary, but it is not an exclusive contract, you can prove that your contact with the owner is not due to the intermediary, and you can be excused. If a friend opens an intermediary, you should sign a confirmation letter with the intermediary company opened by your friend, which should be filled in earlier than the confirmation letter you signed to prove that you have seen the house through other intermediaries. Or think of other ways to prove that you already know the owner or have other friends introduce you.

Whether it will really cause such trouble depends on whether the intermediary will really sue you.

Does the intermediary take people to see the house as harassment? Do I have the right to call the police?