What kind of attitude should we take towards "boycotting Japanese goods"?

If you want to find the most correct mentality, you must find the final answer to this question. Personally, it should be divided into two aspects. Is Japanese goods good or bad for China? Second, should Japanese goods be equated with Japanese issues? On the first question, some people say that what the Japanese sell to China is inferior, so people in China should not buy Japanese goods. I think in order to understand this problem, we must first figure out how to define the quality of Japanese goods we use or what kind of reference we should provide. If he is right, it seems that the goods in our hands are not good compared with other Japanese goods, but what about the goods we can buy around us? I think consumers will naturally realize it when they use it. If they don't use it well compared with other commodities, they will naturally not buy it in the future. But what if they use it better? Who made a mistake? So that's not the reason. Some people say that Japanese goods occupy the China market and hinder the development of national enterprises, which should be resisted. I think both Japanese goods and domestic products are chosen by China people in a relatively fair situation. The choice of Chinese people represents the price-performance ratio of goods. This is a fair selection process. In the selection process, it is natural to eliminate the poor cost performance. It is beneficial to the public and domestic enterprises to promote the cost performance of domestic products through this competitive mechanism. China has a large population. Even if everyone only buys a small commodity, the accumulated wealth is enough to support many enterprises. Once they blindly buy domestic products, a large number of national enterprises will definitely feel good about themselves, so they will stand still and become weak. This process will not only hurt national enterprises, but also hurt the confidence of Chinese people in national enterprises. So that's not the reason. On your second question, some people say that Japan killed many China people in the past and arrested our captain in the Diaoyu Islands incident, so we should not buy Japanese goods to hit its economy. I think if we don't buy Japanese goods, it won't hit the Japanese economy. Why? What are the advantages of Japan over China? This is a high-tech industry, in other words, this product belongs to developed countries and developing countries are eager to get it. If we stop buying Japanese goods, Japanese goods can be sold to other developing countries with the help of the Japanese government (certainly worse than when they were sold to us), and our demand for high technology can only be reduced by several sources. This will only make the seller increase the price and we will bear more losses. Moreover, since we don't buy Japanese goods, it will weaken Japan's economic control ability. In the past, Japan needed to pay attention to our interests, but now it doesn't. The end result of this will only be mutual loss. So that's not the reason.

To sum up, boycotting Japanese goods can't bring us any practical benefits, but the slogan of boycotting Japanese goods is indeed conducive to embodying and strengthening national cohesion, but those acts of smashing and robbing Japanese goods stores are not desirable. If we have to choose an answer, we must have mathematicians to accurately calculate whether the increased cohesion and sales growth of national enterprises can offset all the losses we need to bear after going to Japan in the short term. Will have the real answer.

However, since it is a debate, naturally no one can work it out, so it depends on your original mentality. You can support any idea you want, because every idea has a basis.