Good goods wait for no one.

There are two situations in this situation: 1, good goods wait for no one, others have no good goods. Good goods wait for no one, and the morning market is bustling.

The original sentence is actually the essence of buying without selling. Good goods wait for no one, good goods are not cheap, and cheap goods are not good.

For a long time, the contradictory relationship between expensive and cheap is like two people who have never been in contact with each other, standing sharply on both sides of our lives, holding our fragile consumption concept hostage, as if there is no choice but to be expensive and cheap.

The reason why expensive things are expensive is not willful if you want to be expensive, but huge manufacturing costs, brand costs, operating costs and so on. Expensive is reasonable.

On the contrary, a cheap thing can't be expensive if it is expensive. After all, I lost to you in many links. However, this does not mean that cheap goods are not good, but one of its labels is cheap.

In a well-decorated shopping mall, it is not difficult to see that the first floor, which occupies the advantage of traffic, is always crowded with big names, leaving no room for low-priced brands to survive. Regardless of the national effect between these brands, those low-priced brands have been eliminated by the group from such a domineering location advantage.

This demarcation is cruel and decisive, just like labeling grades to distinguish good students from bad students. In this way, it seems logical that price becomes the only condition to measure the quality of goods, which directly denies the possibility that "cheap goods are good" and "expensive goods are wrong".