As an overhead historical drama, why is the public interested in Ji Xiaolan with iron teeth and copper teeth?

For the convenience of speaking, iron teeth and copper teeth are called iron for short, and Sima Yi, a great think tank, is called Da for short.

People in Ji Xiaolan are not familiar with the characters in Iron Man. Ji Xiaolan wrote Notes on Reading Wei Caotang and edited Siku Quanshu. His life and integrity are not noble, and he is not very famous in history, and there is no concrete abstraction. Small Shenyang is a corrupt official, very cunning. "Small Shenyang fell and Jiaqing ate" is impressive. At that time, the anti-corruption efforts were far less than today, and the people were dissatisfied. People hate corrupt officials and have no choice. Yes, Liu called and kept calling. In short, the corrupt official Xiao Shenyang made a fool of himself, while the honest official was full of wisdom. Watching these plays makes everyone feel better and more balanced. I'd like to watch and talk.

Sima yi, a great think tank, is somewhat unsatisfactory. Sima Yi's historical abstraction is very poor, similar to that of Cao Cao. Moreover, Sima Yi's opponent is Zhuge Liang, who put on the leading role aura for Sima Yi. Where is Zhuge Liang? Zhuge Liang's historical abstraction and literary abstraction are truly sublime, part of our culture and part of our national physiology. Some people have physical resistance to the play, while others are open-minded and realize that the play is just for fun and provides a different perspective. But what does this drama about the Three Kingdoms express? Zhuge Liang's wisdom can be put on the loyalty thought of serving the country and the people. What about Sima Yi's ingenuity and cleverness? It's just ingenuity. There is no power of justice, only the ruthless betrayal of history. Watching this drama, there is not much happiness, and there is not much emotion. Is it a textbook for survival and scheming? Life is full of troubles and the reality is cruel enough. Why is this "Sima Yi"? So the audience will be less, and even fewer people will watch without Wu Xiubo.

Ji Xiaolan with iron teeth and copper teeth is lined with a kind of righteousness, which is closer to our present years; Sima Yi, a great think tank, will inevitably mention Zhuge Liang. We have been taught since childhood that Zhuge Liang devoted himself to death. This is because everyone in the country, company and family wants to be such a person, and maybe others can treat the country, company and family like Zhuge Liang. but

Sima yi, a great think tank

Subconsciously, Zhuge Liang does not conform to the abstraction, but in our subconscious, Zhuge Liang is a kind of god, and it is also to maintain the unity of the Han family. We are Han nationality, and Sima Yi is the representative of rebellion and rebellion in our subconscious. On the contrary, the most important thing is to abolish Emperor Xian of Han Dynasty and stand on his own feet, which is not what he said but also because of him.

Generally speaking, these two films are comedies, advocating the unity of all historical figures, and both films are lined with a kind of political peace. But Ji Xiaolan is only fighting corruption, and the people of China hate corruption, which is in line with the people's taste; However, Sima Yi, a great think tank, looks around the world, but everyone is expecting Zhuge Liang to go out to Sichuan to save the world and advocate oral English, which is in line with people's hearts. But Sima Yi has always been an abstraction of an upright man in people's minds (although unfair to him, what he did at the end of his family was not welcomed by everyone).

Both of them are good plays, but Sima Yi is a little out of line with our inner abstraction and a little arrogant. So it's a little difficult to take over. We can learn from each other if there is something wrong.

Because most people are deeply influenced by the 94 TV series, they even think that this is the case, and they think that Shu Han is orthodox and represents justice. On the other hand, they feel that the three views have been hit and they can't accept it. In fact, Liu Bei is a weaver of straw sandals. In order to compete for the world, he found himself a base ancestor. However, Cao Cao depicted in Romance of the Three Kingdoms is suspicious and has a low IQ. Often humiliated by Zhuge Liang and Zhou Yu. Why didn't Cao Cao get paid? Because he stands for insidious. I would like to ask, in a year when heroes rise, will there be a group of people with lofty ideals who die loyal to Cao Cao without great wisdom and compassion?

China's novels like deifying people, such as Zhuge Liang and Guan Yu in The Romance of the Three Kingdoms. Most people think that this drama beautifies Zhuge Liang, so they will vomit. Because they have all studied examples, most of them will admire and respect Zhuge Liang's loyalty and wisdom. Don't comment on Zhuge Liang's strategy in The Romance of the Three Kingdoms.

Just say that the description of Zhuge Liang in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is different, and the result will be different. First, Pang Tong was jealous of talents, but in The Romance of the Three Kingdoms, it became the foresight of Pang Tong. Second, the Six Outlets of Qishan are militarism, which wastes people's money. The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is to restore the Han Dynasty and unify China. Third, it's a meritocracy to let Masu, who knows his way, go to the street kiosks with empty talk. In Romance of the Three Kingdoms, Zhuge Liang's military law was solemn and he personally killed one of Ma's sons. All this is just my personal opinion. My admiration for Zhuge Liang is like a rolling river.