Who uses a Canon camera?

What type of SLR do professional photographers usually use?

There are many kinds of professional photographers.

Sports photographers and wildlife photographers use top SLR cameras such as Canon 1D, Nikon D3 and D4.

The SLR used by photographers in studios and studios, 6D is enough, and Canon has more. If you really want to go to this industry, there will be more machines. 6D is appropriate, 5D2 is old.

As for freelance photographers, there are many kinds, such as SLR, side shaft, single camera, black card, film machine and old machine. It's okay to use 6D, and it's okay to cut it, just to see if it suits what you want to shoot.

Whether to buy 6D2 or 5D2 depends on your purpose.

If you want to shoot people, still life, scenery (Canon is not recommended for scenery) and so on, 6D is completely enough, even better than 5D2.

But if you want to shoot more moving objects, such as sports photography, birds, or 5D2.

6D has many additional functions, but it is not as good as 5D2. However, 5D2 is old after all, and your choice is very tangled. I suggest 5D3 add more money.

From a professional point of view, 6D is not enough, but it will never be out of date soon. After all, 5D2 in 2008 is used by many people now. The only thing to be wary of is that it will come out after 5D4. If the price of 5D3 drops much, 6D is estimated that no one will buy it.

It's out of date, but nobody buys it, and it's not good to sell second-hand machines. It doesn't mean that the function and performance of the camera are outdated.

The reasons for this are complicated. First of all, Canon's equipment of the same grade is more affordable than other brands. In addition, when shooting portraits, Canon's equipment tends to be magenta, and shooting Asians is more pleasing to the eye. Of course, the most important thing is that Canon has a wealth of portrait lenses, and it is easy to choose the right portrait head, which is unparalleled by other brands.

Why are many short films and even some movies shot with Canon 5D2?

SLR shooting video, there was a whirlwind five or six years ago, and this gust has not ended yet.

In the past, it was very logical for the camera to take video and the camera to take photos. They do their jobs and do not interfere with each other. It was not until Nikon d90 added video shooting function to SLR camera (SD) that SLR camera had camera shooting function. But what really makes SLR camera video shooting fashionable is Canon 5d2.

Canon added 1920 1080 HD resolution video shooting function to the 5d2 camera for the first time. Originally, I just wanted to expand the application scope of SLR and try to add some new fuselage functions. It didn't expect such a function to bring any follow-up reaction, but it hit the nail on the head. I didn't expect that the addition of this function would make 5d2 a generation of video magic machine.

People have long been used to the dull picture taken by the camera, but they just think the video can be clear. However, some video workers suddenly found that the effect of Quan Huafu CMOS SLR 5d2 HD video shooting is as beautiful as a movie screen, which is much better than ordinary hdv cameras. So they gradually tried to shoot some wedding films with 5d2 as the video host, which actually achieved great market response. With the fantastic shallow depth of field effect, high sensitivity and gorgeous picture color brought by Quan Huafu, all traditional cameras can't do it, because the CMOS photosensitive element of SLR is dozens of times that of camera, and it has great advantages in depth of field, sensitivity and color.

As a result, the wedding video studio headed by mayadstudio in Malaysia began to shoot wedding documentaries and wedding short films on a large scale with 5d2 as the main image mode, and 24 teams in China began to shoot wedding films with SLR cameras, all of which gained great influence and commercial success.

Especially, the weddings of Fish Leong and other stars are also shot by SLR, which makes this shooting method a trend. Some film academies and low-cost short film production studios have also begun to use SLR cameras. The news that the Hollywood film "The Action of the Brave" was shot with a 5d2 camera spread, which pushed the fashion of shooting video with SLR to a peak and quickly swept the world. Later, various TV media, advertising companies, etc. Also joined the ranks of SLR video shooting. For example, the famous "China on the Tip of the Tongue" takes a small film machine as the main model, and many shots are shot with the assistance of Canon SLR. Many legal programs also use SLR cameras to restore cases.

The quality of video shot by 5d2 SLR camera surpasses that of traditional cameras, and achieves the effect similar to that of movies in sense, but its cost is far lower than that of expensive models such as arri and red. Only one camera is needed to achieve this effect, which fully meets the needs of the civilian market, so high quality and low cost make SLR video popular. In addition, because the camera is much smaller than the professional camera, in some film shooting, the camera is used to shoot the lens that is not suitable for the camera, and its flexible characteristics have become the auxiliary shooting equipment of the film. For example, Canon's single reaction is used in some scenes in Captain America's movies.

But the video shot by SLR is far less comfortable than the camera. The camera is completely in accordance with the grip mode of photography design, the difficulty of stability, the difficulty of shooting for more than half an hour at a time, the zoom effect of Kardon lens, the auto focus and follow-up focus that are basically unusable, the original recording function, and the input of lens noise are all shortcomings of SLR video shooting. A lot of auxiliary equipment is needed to complete video shooting. Tripod, monopod, camera stabilizer, slide rail, small rocker arm, radio microphone, etc. In order to pursue image quality, we have to pay these prices, but this has not stopped the popularity of SLR video. On the contrary, many manufacturers have seen the business opportunities and constantly improved the video shooting function on the camera, making the camera basically a comprehensive product integrating photography and video.

This wave of camera video shooting brought by Canon 5d2 is popular now. When camera shooting video has become a common phenomenon, traditional dv and small HD products have been greatly impacted. Once you focus on cameras, you can only specialize in the civilian video market, such as corporate meeting video recording, course video recording, accompanying video recording, etc. (the professional field of TV media is still dominated by cameras). On the other hand, in the camera market, video advantages frequently appear, which enriches many models compared with the dominant era of 5d2. In addition to continuing to carry forward the advantages and traditions of SLR video, Canon has also added powerful video functions such as 4k resolution and full-pixel dual-core autofocus to the 5D4 model, allowing SLR to continue to be the main model of the studio, and has also developed a series of cinemaEOS professional video interchangeable lens models, constantly moving forward to the film machine industry.

Since the 5d2 era, Panasonic gh series cameras have been very competitive video models. The cracked gh2 mirrorless camera has the ability of high-speed video shooting, and it is the only machine that can compete with Canon in the field of camera video. Now gh has developed to the sixth generation gh5s, which has super video function and cannot be cracked by players.

Sony has always been a giant in the field of professional imaging, and its professional film cameras occupy a place in the international film market. However, Sony used to distinguish between professional and civilian products, and technology was never easily decentralized. In order to protect our camera product line, we never put high-level video functions on our cameras. But the success of Canon 5d2 taught Sony a profound lesson. Since then, Sony has put various black technology video technologies on the a7s camera, and put high bit rate, log, professional coding format and pp value adjustment on the micro-list, but missed the wave of Canon's video creation. Because of Sony's strong technical backing, in recent years, it has gradually regained some markets eroded by Canon in the camera market and recovered some civilian market share.

Today's cameras are no longer the era of 5d2 scenery. All the above-mentioned manufacturers have relatively perfect video models, but it is undeniable that without the camera video shooting mode pioneered by 5d2 in those years, there may not be a competitive situation in which camera videos are blooming today, and consumers may not use cameras with good image quality, small size and low price, and may still follow the tradition of camera shooting and camera shooting. In this sense, Canon 5d2 deserves to be a magical machine!

Not all movies go to the cinema, so to speak. Not all movies have to be shot with a professional movie camcorder, even a mobile phone+stabilizer. As long as the script is in place, it is a good movie. Canon, Nikon or Huawei Xiaomi are all the same.

According to my personal experience, shooting video with a SLR camera is especially suitable for showing close-ups and scenes that are relatively fixed with people or scenery, such as interviewing people. But SLR cameras are particularly unsuitable for co-production of sports videos. After all, SLR cameras are used to take pictures, and the follow-up focusing function of videos is relatively poor. When shooting people or objects that move faster, especially when moving back and forth, they will not follow the focus, so it is difficult to get good results.

Now the effect of shooting video with SLR camera is very good, especially the mainstream flagship model has supported 4k video shooting, and it is really 4k, and the effect is very clear.

I organized some activities and hired a camera team. They are also recording videos with SLR cameras in Quan Huafu.

However, the owner said that 5d2 should have been a long time ago, because if you record video with a SLR camera now, you can't shoot it without 4k video. Including Canon's full-frame cameras 6d and 6d2, they can only shoot 1080p video. Flagship cameras such as 5d4 and d850 can shoot 4k video. The advantage of 4k video is that even if the area of 1/4 in the video is intercepted, it is still a standard 1080p video, and the later space is very large.

If I don't say it, maybe everyone will think that the picture below is a photo, but it is actually a single frame picture derived from 4k video. It can be seen that his details are perfect.

Moreover, there are more and more stabilizers suitable for SLR cameras and micro-single cameras to shoot video on the market. Both DJI and Yunhe brand have introduced several kinds of SLR stabilizers to make their video shooting more stable than cameras. And for the photography team, since there is a SLR camera to shoot high-quality video instead of the camera, there is no need to spend extra expensive money to buy a special camera.

Due to the high price of professional cameras capable of shooting film-level quality and pictures, 5d2 led the pixel-level cameras and low-cost film-level cameras in that year and achieved great market success.

First of all, the video function of Canon cameras has always been excellent. This self-contained attribute makes wave after wave of video creators choose Canon, and it is like snowballing.

Secondly, Canon's lens group can be used with some Canon cameras. This Nikon is nothing compared with it (it has no camera).

Furthermore, Canon's menu design is more suitable for one-handed control. When shooting video, the other hand needs to master shooting accessories, such as monopod and stabilizer.

Finally, the size of the SLR determines its flexibility. Compared with large machines, small machines are more flexible in some scenes without ground stations. Of course, this is also related to other requirements of the picture, so I won't say it here.

Canon's 5D2, commonly known as "invincible rabbit", has achieved the function of shooting short films in full HD (1920 1080FullHD) in a breakthrough. Because of the wide lens selection range, with the large image sensor and large aperture lens, you can get a small depth of field and form a strong background blur effect. The low noise characteristics of Quan Huafu sensor make the dynamic images taken in dark environment have excellent image quality. High pixels ensure the quality of moving images and reach the level of high definition. It is precisely because of its strong playability and good practical effect that many short films and even some movies are shot with Canon 5D2.

In fact, friends who often play with cameras or camcorders have this experience. The shooting level of digital camera is much better than that of camera. In fact, this is mainly due to their different internal structures. However, although 5D2 has strong camera shooting ability, it is even better than many cameras, but there is still a big gap compared with professional cameras. So the specific choice should be decided according to your actual needs and specific budget.

Thanks to the development of the Internet age, we should analyze it from several aspects. From the point of view of movie viewers, people can watch a movie without waiting for it to be printed in a cinema or broadcast by a TV station. Everyone can watch their favorite movies on their mobile phones or computers, and the pace of life is accelerating, so microfilm comes into being. Viewers can watch it on their mobile phones or computers without watching a boring and lengthy movie, or even take the subway in their spare time.

2. From the perspective of content producers, the threshold has been greatly reduced. In the past, it took dozens or hundreds of people to make a film and a lot of money. Now it only takes a small team of three or four people and a small amount of money. Then a civil plane like 5D2 can satisfy the effects of most traditional movies in terms of both image quality and depth of field, and it is not expected to be played on the big screen. As long as it can be seen on mobile phones or computers, 5D2 is fully satisfied, and it is naturally loved by small teams of low-cost micro-movies.

3. In terms of machine input and performance, the traditional film and television machines are too big and expensive, and the operation is too professional, which is far from the general public. However, a civilian camera like 5D2 is easy to operate, especially the interchangeable lens, which can create various telephoto, macro and shallow depth of field effects at will, and the price is not unattainable. If the traditional video camera can achieve 70~80% effect with very little money, then SLR filming will be popular.

To sum up, the machine is cheap, flexible, can meet the audience, the team cost is low, and the network is developed, which meets the needs of SLR in the era of micro-movies and small videos, and will naturally catch fire.

Because this is a 1 SLR camera that can shoot 1080P HD video. Set a historical precedent for a generation. It is because of this machine that the concept of microfilm was born.

Why do many portrait photographers switch from Canon to Sony?

I only use Weineng to choose other Nikon brands.

Hello, to be exact, it's a cameraman from Canon. Many people left Canon and went to Sony. Yes, this is mainly the cameraman.

For photo studios, photography studios, wedding photography, children's photography and beauty photography, Canon is still the absolute main force, and it will be difficult to be replaced in the future.

However, to be honest, Canon's camera performance is not as good as Panasonic and Sony. Therefore, it is really wise to give up Canon and go to Sony and Panasonic for professional video shooting.

Photography and video, yard by yard.

In the professional fields of radio, television and film, Canon is actually a program terminator. Canon robbed more than half of the civilian market, which made Gensonnie and Panasonic very unhappy.

But Canon has never really entered the radio and television film market, that is, the TV station market and the film market. For those who shoot videos professionally, Canon is basically not the first choice.

Although Sony and Panasonic have also made great efforts in the civilian market recently, Canon has a very solid market in wedding photography and activity photography.

Why?

Because Sony's direct color is too bad and Sony's operation is too professional. Although Sony is more professional than Canon.

But for wedding photography, simplicity, high efficiency, reducing costs and increasing profits are the king.

Therefore, in the wedding camera market, as well as a large number of civilian markets, Canon still has great advantages and tenacious vitality.

Just say, in the professional image shooting market, Canon may indeed be completely driven out, especially now that Panasonic has also launched the Quan Huafu micro-single, I'm afraid Canon will never get their hands on the professional image shooting market in the future.

Finally, talk about the photo market!

For many people, it is actually just taking pictures without taking pictures.

Moreover, to put it bluntly, there are photographers and there are no photographers.

Photographers basically rely on photography to earn money to support their families, even short videos from the media.

For photographers, for users who don't take pictures.

In fact, I think Canon SLR and Fuji micro-single, as well as future Panasonic micro-single, are very good.

But for camera users, Fuji micro-sheets are not enough. Even if Fuji has made some efforts recently, the parameters are beautiful. However, I'm afraid Fuji will never return to heaven. Well, Fuji is powerless in the camera market, that's for sure.

If you just take pictures, my suggestions are as follows:

1, if you mainly shoot portraits, beautiful women and children, Canon should be the best choice at present and in the future, that's for sure.

2. If you are a young man in travel photography, daily life photography and literature and art, then Fuji Micro-single is very good.

3. If you are a professional photographer, well, a professional photographer, a professional photographer, the most promising system in the future is Panasonic's Quan Huafu micro-single.

Why do many portrait photographers switch from Canon cameras to Suni now? Whether it is a Canon camera or a Suni camera, photographers know that, first, it is performance comparison. Micro-lens is not comparable to any camera. I think the portrait photos taken by Canon cameras are very colorful. After using Suni camera, it needs to be adjusted when taking portraits. It's really troublesome, otherwise the portrait photos taken can't compare with Canon cameras. If you use a Canon camera, don't switch to a Suni camera. If you have never used a Canon camera, you can use a Suni camera. This is called no contrast, no harm. If you start with a Canon camera, don't switch to a Suni camera, because the color of Suni camera needs to be adjusted every time. Canon doesn't need to adjust the color, and the color looks good when taking portraits. As long as you use a Canon camera, you will feel unaccustomed to using a Suni camera.

Many portrait photographers have replaced Canon cameras with Sony? I wonder if the questioner of this question has real data. In my opinion, this trend has not fundamentally changed. Portrait photographers use canon, which was and is now.

It is a fact that the traditional camera brands Canon and Nikon have lost customers, which can be seen from the official statement, but this is a comprehensive market trend, and not all the lost customers have gone to Sony. There is no denying that some door-changing users have switched from Canon to Sony, but this has not become the mainstream, especially "portrait photographers". I know that if I say this, there will definitely be many so-called fans of a certain sect to attack, but it doesn't matter. I don't want to join any camera brand dispute, which is meaningless.

People who like early adopters are not really "photographers" but enthusiasts. Except for professionals who are sponsored by manufacturers to try out cameras, most ordinary professional photographers like photography, landscape photography, fashion photography and so on. , and will not easily change the camera brand. This brand change is not to give up all the original lenses and buy them again, but the whole working system must be rebuilt. This is not just a financial investment. The whole team should re-learn to adapt to the new system, the supporting lighting system should be readjusted, the technology of post-patching should be changed, all supporting batteries and other accessories should be replaced, and the most important thing is to re-run the teamwork. The change of this door is not only the cost of capital investment, but also the inconvenience of work, and its intangible cost is greater than the computable cost.

For photographers who shoot portraits, no matter whether they shoot personal portraits, private houses, children or various documentary portraits, it can be said that any brand of cameras on the market can meet the demand. The matter of "taking pictures" pays more attention to the photographer's experience, technology and teamwork, and has little to do with the current camera model. As long as the technical style, workflow, equipment and post-training are unified in a working team, the film can meet the creative needs. This will not lead to any essential difference in works because of Canon's lower tolerance, nor will it lead to more hindquarters because of Sony's fewer lenses, nor will it cause great work inconvenience because of which is better, optical focusing or cmos integrated focusing. I can only say that all cameras can meet the needs of work, especially photo photography, and the differences between these models are really minimal.

Of course, many photographers who change doors choose Sony a7 series not to improve the quality of photos, but to expand the types of shooting subjects, which is conducive to the transfer of video to creation. Sony, including Panasonic, does have a deep technical background in video. At present, many civilian models have applied the following professional video technologies, such as log, such as 4k, such as better sampling rate, such as high frame rate and so on. These Canon models are really not as real as Sony's. Sony or even Panasonic is a good choice for video shooting. This is no problem. But if a photographer changes doors to Sony, I personally feel that there is really a lack of factual data.

I really don't like people who haven't touched Sony Quan Huafu micro-singles. Say something.

Canon's 80d, 6d2 and 5d4 were used at first, and then Sony a7m2 was used. To tell you the truth, I'm not satisfied with m2, especially the shutter. The time lag is very long, and the shutter sounds annoying. The battery really doesn't work. I bought three spare parts and later replaced them with a7m3. This machine is really cool, full-screen focusing, high-speed continuous shooting, accurate and fast focusing. What? The battery is broken? You find a channel to try! M3 can persist at the end of a normal shooting day. I didn't go to see how many pictures I took, because I almost never had to worry about running out of electricity. I can also bring a charging treasure with too high intensity for shooting and charge it at any time.

I think many people say that micro-menu is not good. First, it's never been used. It is also possible that changing doors is too expensive and Sony lenses are expensive. And many people are used to the operation of Canon Nikon. The way Sony defines shortcut keys is not used by many people. There is also the fact that Canon people have more advantages in skin color performance without later period.

The mage is too old to carry the SLR. If they change the micro-order, they will have a sense of accomplishment.

Just like martial arts, you can defend yourself against the enemy by learning boxing and practicing sword. It's like practicing taking photos with your mobile phone, mastering the basics, becoming a master in SLR, and finally wandering around the rivers and lakes with a little black card.

The above is a joke, but in many cases, it is also true: when I first started, I always felt that equipment was very important. Give me that good lens, and I can take better photos. If I had that camera, I could have taken these good photos.

After a long time, I finally found that the head portrait behind my camera has the highest value! The equipment really doesn't matter at this time. What SLR can do, so can micro-single. What SLR can't do, micro-single can still be done, and it is light and easy to carry. Why not change it?

Then why Sony? To tell the truth, there are really no micro-orders, and the categories in Bisogni are more complete. Even if one or two of them can surpass it, photography needs to be systematic. Unlike mobile phones, Apple can be used as soon as it is thrown away by Huawei tomorrow.

Sony has been listed since 2065 438+03 A7, and has been updating the micro-list. Wife is fast, there are always some points that can firmly grasp your caution and make you want to stop!

There are A9, A7s, A7r, A7m, Rx 1, Rx 10, Rx0 ... Come on, what's missing? Maybe facing Sony, it can only be said that it is short of money.

Don't those who spit out Sony yellow, those who black Sony menu, and those who complain about Sony batteries hate iron and steel because they expect too much from Sony?

Take photos, record eyes, show off orders and make money. What purpose do you want the camera to help you achieve?

The camera said, I'm embarrassed because most people won't tell me what he wants from me. ...

Or the great god ET said, expensive and good.

Buy it, buy it, change it, change it, don't hesitate to pick the expensive one and kill it!

At the moment you press the shutter, you can feel the meat bleeding, so he can smoke and look into the distance with an indifferent expression. It is meaningful to tell the little whites that after playing photography for many years, I am rarely worth pressing the shutter now!

After practicing peerless martial arts, it is not easy. Congratulations to the world, you will get another old mage!

First of all, this question is a false proposition:

What is the origin of this problem?

Who gave the statistics?

Many amateur players abandon Canon's SLR camera and switch to Sony's micro-camera. This situation exists. However, the upgrading of photographers' equipment is two-way, and many people are not satisfied with Sony's micro-orders and turn to Canon's products. This situation is not uncommon.

Therefore, this question is completely fabricated and speculated, which does not conform to the objective facts.

Secondly, how to compare Sony's camera system with Canon's camera system?

First of all, Canon's products are now in the transition stage from SLR cameras to micro-single cameras, while Sony has completed this mode conversion in previous years, so the system at this stage is perfect as follows:

Canon SLR Sony micro single Canon micro single

Sony's main advantages are advanced image sensor technology and powerful computing power of image processor (arm architecture). Therefore, Sony's micro-camera parameters and specifications are excellent. For example, video, a7m3 is much better than Canon 5D4 and EOSR.

Canon's response to the advantages of Sony Electronics is mainly solved in two ways:

Canon SLR camera is faced with optical framing+independent focusing module+multiprocessor parallelism.

Canon's micro-camera uses a larger bayonet and better lens control.

Therefore, I hope that photographers will rationally look at the "brand dispute" between devices. There is no best product, only the equipment that suits you best.

I won't leave Canon for Sony. I remember many years ago, my relatives went to America and brought back a Sony. At that time, they called for a digital camera to replace the SLR, but it didn't take long for it to break down. At that time, there was no maintenance department in China, so I threw this Sony away and wasted hundreds of dollars. So I left a bad impression on Sony, and as long as I saw Sony in the future, I left far away. Now it is said that Sony Dafa micro-single is very powerful, but I won't buy it, even though our unit has a Sony camera, which is only used to record leadership activities.

First of all, Canon and Nikon are among the best in the SLR camera photography market. Sony also appeared in the traditional SLR market a few years ago, but now it is rare. Regarding the micro-single, I have to say that Sony is a black technology and the best one. Then the point comes. Why abandon Canon SLR and enter Sony micro-single?

The key is that people like to pursue novelty, like to wear new clothes and like new products and applications. When the black technology of Sony Micro-single comes out, a large number of photographers will inevitably follow up.

The second is the portability of micro-single. According to my experience, the micro-sheet is small and portable, and it is intuitive to take pictures. Compared with SLR, it is really convenient, but the battery life is too troublesome. In the past, the SLR was charged for several days at a time, and the micro-single took two or three batteries. Sleeping in the hotel at night is also worried about charging.

Third, Sony dominates the camera field, so Sony's micro-camera function is very easy to use. This is very fashionable, it should be a follow-up video fire. Fourth, Sony is the first to launch a micro-single with 4K and 40 million pixels or more, which surpasses SLR in image quality and has more advantages in video, attracting many people to pursue it.

Fifth, the focus area is large and there are many points, which can be said to be almost full-screen focus.

Sixth, Sony Dafa has done a good job in advertising.

However, the disadvantages of microlens are also obvious: the larger lens is not coordinated when installed on the microlens, the endurance of the microlens is too poor, the reaction speed is slightly slow, and the microlens group is weak.

It is difficult to answer typing on mobile phone, please correct me.

I feel that there are also many Canon users.

Why do business portrait photographers use Canon instead of Nikon for their 135 cameras?

Canon really uses it more.

At that time, the Canon market was developed. The 5D2 and 5D2 eras have had a great impact on the rapidly developing digital imaging industry. In addition, the lens group of EF bayonet will keep these customers to continue to use Canon.

Canon's processor algorithm does have an advantage in portrait.