Why does Li Na have such a bad face?

Winning the Australian Open and holding this hard-won Grand Slam title should have been a great event that would make people laugh out loud in their dreams. But Li Na, who appeared in front of everyone, didn't accept the flowers, didn't say a word, didn't smile the whole time, and even deliberately put on a bad face. Therefore, many people are very puzzled: Li Na, why are you so sunny abroad but cloudy immediately after returning to China?

Sister Na’s unhappiness is not a trivial matter, and will inevitably trigger a series of chain effects: the leaders are unhappy, the Wuhan media is unhappy, the people in her hometown are unhappy, and of course fans across the country are also unhappy. Of course, the advertisers who spend tens of millions of dollars in endorsement fees for her may not be happy either.

Li Na, why are you unhappy? The real reason is naturally unknown to outsiders, and people can only speculate. Battle fatigue? Don't want to be met by the leader? Or do you think the reward of 800,000 yuan is too small?

But no matter what the reason is, it is really inappropriate for Li Na to behave like this in public. Celebrities and stars are different from ordinary people. While enjoying the glory brought by high exposure, they should also assume corresponding obligations and social responsibilities. If it doesn't make you happy, do it, and if you don't, don't do it; if it's beneficial, do it, and if it's unprofitable, don't do it; if it's profitable, do it with all your strength, and if it's profitable, do it half-heartedly.

An excellent athlete should not only defeat opponents and achieve brilliant results on the field, but also show good mental outlook and moral cultivation outside the field, convey positive energy, and provide young people with positive energy. Set an example. Li Na was once hailed as the flagship figure in Chinese sports after Yao Ming and Liu Xiang. Now it seems that this flag is difficult to raise.

In today’s inclusive society, we allow and even encourage athletes to have their own personalities and temperaments. Li Na’s persistence, tenacity, and persistence in sportsmanship, as well as her rare sense of humor, are what make her so dazzling. ’s shining point. But it is undeniable that controversies about her are everywhere.

No one requires Li Na to please anyone against her will and to be a star who can have both sides of the story and speak insincerely, but she cannot ignore the public's feelings at all. Li Na's performance when she returned to China was indeed a bit better. She should be wary of going to the other extreme - treating ignorance as fearlessness and willfulness as personality. What's more, competitive sports are ruthless. Players' peak will always pass, and no matter how big the big names are, they will always return to ordinary people.

Of course, regarding the 800,000 yuan reward given by the Hubei Provincial Government, Li Na, who often receives millions of yuan in competition prizes, may not care, but in the eyes of many people, this is a very "nothing". thing. In a survey conducted by a portal website on "Do you support the government's award of 800,000 yuan to Li Na?", only 14 people "supported" and 86 "do not support", which can be said to be one-sided.

Including Li Na herself, she has stated many times that she plays basketball on her own. After winning the Australian Open, Sister Na thanked everyone and did not mention thanking the country. Now that you are flying solo, is this kind of formal reward still necessary? Moreover, even though Sister Na was given this huge bonus, she still didn’t want to see her. She wanted to slap her in the face with her hot face, but she didn’t mean to spend money to slap herself in the face?

800,000 yuan is actually not a small amount. Professional players make money from game bonuses and commercial activities. If they play for themselves, what is the reward from the government?

The Chinese New Year is coming soon. I hope Sister Na can have a good New Year at home. I hope that next time, she will be happy enough to make everyone happy.

Our reporter Guan Yin

Offsite voice

Put on sunglasses immediately

Among Li Na’s long list of sponsors, it seems that none Brand of sunglasses. This was a mistake on her part. Li Na should have a pair of sunglasses.

Li Na’s nameless fire surprised us who were proud of her a few days ago. Some of us became angry, and some even became angry: Why do we look at your bad face? !Isn’t he just a ball player...

This is a bit unpleasant to hear.

However, we really don’t understand why Li Na, who is 1.73 meters tall, has a face that exceeds 1.70 meters when she returns to Wuhan, especially to her mentor.

We don’t understand why Li Na, who is allergic to pollen, did not let Jiang Shan enter the venue holding flowers when entering the Australian Open final? Could it be that I am allergic to Chinese pollen?

We still don’t understand, did the Hubei Provincial Government give her a bonus of 800,000 yuan or a debt of 800,000 yuan?

When so many "don't understands" gather together and she can't answer "why", or she doesn't want to answer "why", she should wear a pair of sunglasses.

Behind the jet-black lenses, Li Na can easily shoot a fierce light with a speed of over 200 kilometers per hour.

Maintaining due demeanor and politeness in public is not the fundamental difference between athletes trained under the national system and athletes trained under the market system. This cannot be confused.

Li Na, please put on your sunglasses. This is for your sake, because after all, your outstanding performance on the court makes us proud. If one day, we (and possibly sponsors) all look at you through colored glasses, this day will be...

Happy

Voices from all sides

■ Bonuses are too unruly

After Li Na won the French Open in 2011, both Hubei Province and Wuhan City gave her bonuses. At that time, the province gave her 600,000, which increased to 800,000 this time. In the context of neither residents' income nor office workers' wages exceeding GDP, the unknown government bonuses are growing at a rocket speed, which is like a cold joke.

The government's power to control taxes should be exercised in accordance with the law, at least not too arbitrarily, and should also depend on public opinion. The last time Li Na was rewarded, she was booed. If government officials just slap on the forehead and reward whoever they say they will reward, spending money is too unruly. Aren't you afraid that people will say "You don't feel bad if you sell your land?"? What is the place of public opinion in the minds of officials?

(Excerpted from "People's Daily Online Viewpoint Channel" on January 28)

■ Don't think of Li Na as Lei Feng

Li Na won the French Open that year, just like the company Although the first step of the IPO was successful, the next step still needs to be done. What Li Na is concerned about is how long she can play tennis, how well she can play, and more realistically, how much bonus she can get. Therefore, economic benefits are definitely her focus. Of course, this does not mean that she does not pay attention to social benefits at all.

This deviation is that we are too demanding on the social responsibilities she should bear: treating her as Lei Feng (of course, this is a bit absolute, but the meaning is good) and treating her as a model for learning. Now, Na should really pay attention to her words and deeds.

The question is, can her character become such a person, or even, do we definitely need such a person now?

When you don't have such high demands on her, maybe she will be more likable than she is now - especially to those who don't like her now.

(Excerpted from "Oriental Sports Daily" on January 24)

■ She is not a "reverse" symbol

Li Na's success has become a source of concern for many opponents The most typical example of a loudspeaker is the voice that opposes the national system. Whenever Sister Na makes some progress, someone will always appear in time and repeatedly emphasize that athletes strive for individuals rather than represent a certain group. While praising professionalism, they do not forget to criticize the backwardness of the professional system. This seems to be a kind of "politics" "Correct" stance and standing in line. But unfortunately, they do not understand (or deliberately ignore) the fact that Li Na's success today is precisely based on the national system.

(Excerpted from "Oriental Sports Daily" on January 29)