How to write the second draft of the debate competition?

The format of the second argument in the debate

I don’t know which province you are from and what the rules of the debate are. Taking Jiangsu Province where I am as an example, most debates Among the commonly used rules, the second defense mainly conducts defense and plays an important role in free defense. The second defense of the affirmative side selects the second or third defense of the negative side for one-on-one defense. The questioner is only allowed to ask questions, and the answerer is only allowed to answer. In the same way, the affirmative's three defenses also select the second or third defense of the negative side to attack one-on-one, and the same is true for the second and third defenses of the negative side. The defense questions should be concise and clear. Try to ask questions that have universal truth or a unique answer, such as yes or no or how much is one plus one, and should focus on the opening statement of your first defense. In other words, the effect that the question wants to achieve is still In order to prove that your point of view is correct, as far as your question is concerned, the focus is on the characteristics of Conan and Bajie. Use your own advantages to attack the other party, or use the other party's shortcomings to attack. You can set up a chain of questions. Next Let the opponent drill the set, and finally give a simple explanation. If you are interested we can discuss it.

How to write a rebuttal statement for the second debate in a debate

The second debate mainly prepares a rebuttal, refutes the opponent's first defense, and emphasizes one's own point of view. Writing a manuscript is very important. Prepare at least five points that the other party will hit, but they must be prioritized. The second debate focuses on early preparation and on-site reaction. One point is about 5 to 6 lines of Xiaosi’s words. The tasks of the second debate The main purpose is to refute the other party and supplement one's own side.

Don’t bring your own opinions when preparing. First think about what the other party will say. When writing, you should look at the arguments and refute them with arguments. The approximate total word count is 650~750, and the number of words varies for different competition formats. It is required that the draft of the speech should be prioritized. First, refute the other party's premise, which is the basis of the other party's argument. Definitions, standards, and background can also be refuted, but the background should be used with caution. Secondly, refute the other party's logical deduction and loopholes, making the inference untenable. The refutation standard is to establish an argument in one sentence, which is the standard for the other party to judge the position, refute the point again, and finally refute the point.

The language should be straightforward and avoid too many detours. It is very important to make an argument. You should tactfully repeat your own point of view. In the end, you must agree with your teammates. That’s all. I hope it can help you. ~~

The format of the second argument in the debate is 10 points

The question is whether the best friend of the opposite sex is a lie. I am the right side, thank you

The second debate Defense Speech

In fact, this issue needs to be considered from different standpoints. If it is the opposing side, it should be able to say this: Our point of view is that mothers should not read our chat history. Let me first state that this was done when my mother read our chat history and we didn’t know about it. (Pause for a few seconds) We children also have privacy. Although our mother is doing it for our own good, she should respect us, and she has no right to see our privacy. Constitution of the People's Republic of China, Article 40 The freedom of communication and the confidentiality of communication of citizens of the People's Republic of China are protected by law. Except for the need for national security or the investigation of criminal crimes, where the public security organs or procuratorial organs inspect communications in accordance with the procedures prescribed by law, no organization or individual may infringe on citizens' freedom of communication and communication confidentiality for any reason. This is my first time writing, I hope it helps you!

How to write the second argument of the opposing side in a debate to refute the other party's argument

The second argument is usually to seize the loopholes in the opponent's first argument and enlarge the question. If you cannot catch it, You can prepare some questions in advance. You can ask from your side's standpoint, that is, follow your own side's draft of the argument, or you can stand in the position of refuting the opponent's side.

For example, in this debate, many questions are definitional, such as the meaning and purpose of establishing tourist attractions, the reasons for buying tickets for tourist attractions, etc. The other party did not say anything in the first defense draft, just You can take it out and ask.

I am also doing the second defense. In fact, the questions prepared in the early stage are generally useless. The essence of the second defense is to seize the other party's loopholes and ask questions. The key is to catch the opponent's loopholes. The more you practice this kind of thing, the better.

Second debate speech 20 points

Is it necessary to state a point of view in the second debate? Still only responsible for attacking and defending.

You can establish your own opinions from the following perspectives:

1. So far, no authoritative organization has proven that it is harmless.

2. There are also some developed countries that prohibit the commercial sale of genetically modified foods.

3. If genetically modified food is safe, why should it be packaged differently from other foods? (Please specify)

Also avoid:

1. Being trapped in large categories. There are many kinds of food: animal, plant, health care, etc. . Some of them have been proven edible, some have not. Generally speaking, plant-based foods are safer than animal-based foods.

2. Don’t insist on it. The other party will definitely come up with some examples to prove that it is edible. You should avoid their sharp edges and find loopholes in edible and safe consumption.

Finally, the person who asked this question is really incompetent. Nowadays, everyone is not full, so they assume that it is safe if it is edible, and no one mentions it. The environment is bigger than us, so there is nothing we can do.

How to prepare a good second argument in a debate?

The duty of the second defense of the opposing side is to conduct debate, which is the same as that of the third defense. Listen carefully to the opponent's debater's statement, and then find points in the opponent's words that you can refute.

What are the first, second, third and fourth debates in the debate competition?

I don’t know what competition format you are in. There are four people making speeches, some attacking and defending, and some asking questions. Each situation is different.

Generally speaking, it is generally accepted that the first debater is responsible for stating one's own point of view. Excluding the factors of personal style, the basic responsibility of the first debater is to clearly explain the understanding of both sides' arguments, the premise, standards and reasons for one's own point of view, highlight the key points, and express it clearly and fluently. And when there are distortions of basic definitions and views in subsequent debates, you must promptly respond and clarify, and master a large amount of data and examples, because the first debater should be the person who has the strongest grasp of his own point of view

Second and third debates Generally speaking, debaters with quick reactions and strong language styles are used, because considering the formation, the second and third debates should reflect the feeling of charging into the battle. Therefore, it is necessary to ask and answer questions a lot, to show a confrontational and aggressive attitude, and to make the game more intense and exciting.

The fourth debater is recognized as a concluding speaker and must have an overall view and the ability to grasp the fundamentals. When summarizing, you should sort out the context of the whole scene, find out the points of confrontation, then point out the mistakes made by the other party here, then put forward the correct understanding, and finally explain your own reasons from a higher perspective. During the free debate, the fourth debater should make full use of his "bystander" perspective to discover problems in the opponent's argument and argument, and promptly point them out to guide teammates to attack. The speeches in the fourth debate must be meaningful and should not be empty talk.

So your problem can be solved like this. The first and fourth debates are better at discovering the other party’s problems, so they launch an attack (or lock the target), and the ones responsible for attacking are the second and third debates. They Strengthen the problems discovered by teammates. Therefore, it is the second and third debates that are offensive in form, but in essence, the first and fourth debates determine the direction, which makes it appear that there is a division of labor rather than each person fighting against his own. Questions prepared in advance are not included here, because those are tactics and not the responsibility of the attacker.

In the debate, besides asking questions, what else should I do in the second debate? Do I need to write a manuscript or something? What skills do I have as the opposition?

If you think your The on-site response is not that fast, so you can make a draft first. You can understand the shortcomings of the positive views and criticize them based on their shortcomings. Technique, it depends on what you are debating. Anyway, you must listen carefully to what the advocates have to say, find out their flaws, and then debate with your own points of view. The second debate is not just about asking questions, you can actively debate.

Request: The second argument of the debate competition

Proof: "Salary is more meaningful for employee motivation" because everyone depends on money to eat and work. If there is no money, there will be no motivation to work. Salary is the best encouragement for employees, so: "For employee motivation, salary is more meaningful."

Opposition: "Challenging work is more meaningful for employee motivation", because if you keep doing the same job, you will get bored and lose the motivation to work. No matter how much you do, you will get bored. Money is inevitably useful, and nothing can be done without motivation, so "challenging work is more meaningful for employee motivation."